These answers draw in part from “Coalition, Competition, and the Coveted Seat at the Table: People of Color Organizations Navigating Traditionally White Only Spaces in Solidarity” by Adrienne Bradley, M.ED., BCBA, LBA (BehaviorLive), and extend it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. Clinical framing, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →The professional infrastructure of behavior analysis directly impacts service delivery. When diversity-focused organizations are well-supported and collaborative, they produce better training, mentorship, and advocacy that improves cultural competence across the field. When these organizations are fragmented by competition for limited resources, the field loses critical sources of cultural knowledge. Additionally, understanding systemic dynamics helps you recognize how institutional patterns of inclusion and exclusion may affect your clients' experiences with behavior-analytic services and their willingness to engage in treatment.
The seat at the table represents positions of influence, decision-making authority, and visibility within traditionally White professional organizations and institutions. When these organizations create limited positions for diverse representation, the scarcity creates conditions where People of Color organizations may compete rather than collaborate. The metaphor highlights how inclusion efforts that offer too few positions of genuine influence can inadvertently reproduce dynamics of marginalization. True inclusion requires expanding the table rather than offering one or two seats to representatives of diverse communities.
Trauma-informed behavior analysis expands the range of variables considered during functional assessment. Setting events and establishing operations may include trauma histories, experiences of discrimination, and institutional marginalization. Assessment environments should be evaluated for perceived safety and cultural appropriateness. Interview questions should explore the client's history with systems and institutions that may contribute to current behavioral patterns. Intervention design should prioritize client choice, predictability, and empowerment. This approach does not replace functional analysis but enriches it by accounting for trauma-related variables that influence behavior.
Performative engagement involves symbolic gestures like diversity statements, limited representation on committees, and partnerships that do not include genuine power sharing. It creates the appearance of inclusion without changing underlying power structures. Substantive engagement involves structural changes to governance, resource allocation, hiring practices, and decision-making that redistribute power and influence. Substantive engagement includes accountability mechanisms, sustained resource commitment, and measurement of outcomes beyond representation numbers. Behavior analysts can evaluate their organizations by examining who holds decision-making authority and how resources are distributed.
Effective allyship involves sustained action rather than symbolic gestures. Educate yourself about racial dynamics without expecting colleagues of color to be your teachers. Use your institutional influence to advocate for structural changes in diversity and inclusion practices. Amplify the work of People of Color organizations through your professional networks. When you hold positions of power, actively work to redistribute influence and resources. Accept feedback about your own participation in problematic dynamics without defensiveness. Recognize that allyship is an ongoing practice that requires accountability, humility, and willingness to make mistakes and learn from them.
Code 1.07 (Cultural Responsiveness and Diversity) requires ongoing professional development in cultural awareness. Code 1.06 (Nondiscrimination) prohibits discrimination and requires equitable treatment. Code 2.01 (Providing Effective Treatment) connects organizational dynamics to service quality through the pipeline from diverse practitioners to culturally competent care. Code 2.09 (Involving Clients and Stakeholders) mandates meaningful engagement with diverse perspectives. Code 1.05 (Scope of Competence) extends to cultural competence for specific populations. Together, these codes establish that addressing racial dynamics is an ethical obligation, not an optional professional activity.
Competition fragments the collective advocacy power of underrepresented groups, making it harder to push for systemic changes in research priorities, training standards, and service delivery models. It diverts energy and resources from the shared goal of improving representation and cultural responsiveness. It can create divisions that benefit existing power structures by preventing unified demands for change. It may also contribute to burnout among practitioners of color who are navigating these dynamics while managing clinical responsibilities. Building coalition through intentional solidarity efforts strengthens the collective voice and accelerates progress toward equity.
Systemic racism functions as a pervasive environmental variable that shapes establishing operations, discriminative stimuli, and reinforcement contingencies for individuals from marginalized communities. Experiences of discrimination may function as setting events that alter the momentary value of escape or avoidance as reinforcers. Institutional environments that have historically been unwelcoming may function as discriminative stimuli for defensive or avoidant behavior. Behavior analysts who fail to account for these systemic variables risk misidentifying the function of behavior and designing interventions that address symptoms rather than root causes.
Organizations should start by assessing current structures honestly, ideally with external evaluation. Move from single diversity positions to multiple positions with genuine decision-making authority. Allocate sustained resources rather than one-time funding for diversity initiatives. Create accountability mechanisms with measurable outcomes beyond representation counts. Engage People of Color organizations as partners in governance, not just consultants. Compensate the emotional and intellectual labor of diversity work rather than treating it as volunteer service. Build feedback loops that allow members from underrepresented groups to report concerns without retaliation.
Solidarity involves actively supporting colleagues and organizations from different cultural backgrounds, even when there is no direct personal benefit. It means showing up for events hosted by diverse organizations, sharing resources and platforms, mentoring across cultural lines, and using institutional influence to create opportunities for underrepresented colleagues. Within clinical practice, solidarity means standing with clients against systems that marginalize them, advocating for policy changes that improve access to services, and designing interventions that honor clients' cultural identities. It requires sustained commitment that extends beyond crisis moments of heightened awareness.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Coalition, Competition, and the Coveted Seat at the Table: People of Color Organizations Navigating Traditionally White Only Spaces in Solidarity — Adrienne Bradley · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $10
Take This Course →We extended these answers with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind the topic, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
280 research articles with practitioner takeaways
189 research articles with practitioner takeaways
183 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $10 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.