These answers draw in part from “Conflict Resolution: An Essential Skill for Every Leader” by Ellie Kazemi, PhD (BehaviorLive), and extend it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. Clinical framing, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →Behavior analysts operate in environments that are inherently conflict-prone. They work with emotionally charged situations involving vulnerable populations, collaborate with professionals from different disciplines who may hold different theoretical views, supervise staff who implement complex procedures, and partner with caregivers who are often under tremendous stress. Unresolved conflict in any of these relationships can directly compromise client services. Additionally, behavior analysts' training in precision and evidence-based practice can sometimes create interpersonal friction when their communication style is perceived as rigid or dismissive of non-behavioral perspectives. Developing conflict resolution skills allows behavior analysts to advocate for quality services while maintaining productive working relationships.
A useful decision framework considers three factors: impact on client services, trajectory of the conflict, and the relationship's importance. If the conflict is affecting client care in any way, intervention is warranted regardless of other factors. If the conflict is escalating or recurring, it is unlikely to resolve without deliberate effort. If the relationship is important for ongoing professional functioning, investing in resolution is worthwhile even for relatively minor disagreements. Conversely, a one-time disagreement with a colleague you rarely interact with, on a topic that does not affect client services, may not require a formal resolution effort. The key is making this assessment deliberately rather than defaulting to avoidance.
A genuine professional apology has four components. First, it names the specific behavior or action that caused the problem, demonstrating that you understand what happened. Second, it acknowledges the impact that behavior had on the other person without minimizing it. Third, it takes responsibility without qualifiers such as but or if, which shift blame to the other person. Fourth, it includes a concrete statement about what you will do differently going forward. Phrases like I apologize if you were offended or I'm sorry but I was under a lot of pressure fail because they deflect responsibility. An effective apology might sound like: I gave you that feedback in front of the team, and that was not appropriate. I understand that was embarrassing, and I should have waited for a private moment. Going forward, I will address performance concerns one-on-one.
Begin by separating the professional disagreement from any personal frustration you feel. Seek to understand the other professional's specific concerns about ABA, which may be based on outdated information, negative experiences with particular practitioners, or legitimate critiques that deserve consideration. Focus on shared goals, which almost always center on the client's wellbeing and progress. Use language that translates behavioral concepts into terms accessible to other disciplines without condescending. When possible, share client outcome data that demonstrates the effectiveness of your approach. If the professional remains dismissive despite good-faith efforts, escalate through appropriate channels such as team leadership rather than continuing to engage in an unproductive cycle.
Active listening is arguably the most important skill in conflict resolution because most people in conflict do not feel heard. When someone does not feel heard, they escalate. Active listening involves giving full attention to the speaker, reflecting back what you have heard to confirm understanding, asking clarifying questions rather than making assumptions, acknowledging the emotional component of what is being communicated, and withholding your own response until you have genuinely understood the other person's perspective. This process often reveals that the disagreement is smaller than it appeared, that there are underlying concerns that are more important than the surface issue, or that the other person primarily needed to feel understood before being open to alternative perspectives.
Start by exploring the caregiver's concerns without defensiveness. Their resistance often signals something important, whether it is a value conflict, a practical barrier, a prior negative experience, or a concern they have not yet articulated. Ask open-ended questions about what specifically concerns them and listen carefully to the answers. Validate the legitimate aspects of their perspective. Present your clinical rationale clearly, using language that is accessible and avoiding jargon. When possible, offer choices or modifications that address their concerns while maintaining clinical integrity. Document the discussion and any agreed-upon compromises. If the disagreement involves a safety concern, be clear about your obligations while remaining respectful.
Conflict with a supervisor requires navigating the power differential carefully. Prepare for the conversation by clarifying the specific issue and what outcome you are seeking. Request a private meeting rather than raising the issue publicly. Use I-statements to describe the impact of the situation on your work without attributing negative intent to your supervisor. Be open to the possibility that you are missing context or information that explains your supervisor's position. If the direct conversation does not resolve the issue and the conflict involves ethical concerns or is affecting client services, consult the organizational hierarchy or seek guidance from a trusted mentor. Document the situation in case escalation becomes necessary.
Culture change starts with modeling. When you address conflict openly, acknowledge your own mistakes, and respond non-defensively to feedback, you demonstrate that these behaviors are safe and valued. Establish team norms that explicitly address how disagreements will be handled, such as committing to direct communication rather than gossip, agreeing to raise concerns within a specified timeframe, and establishing regular check-ins where team members can surface issues. Reinforce constructive conflict behavior when you observe it by acknowledging when team members handle disagreements well. Address destructive conflict behavior such as personal attacks, passive aggression, or avoidance promptly and privately.
The timing and setting of a conflict resolution conversation significantly influence its outcome. Approaching someone when they are in the middle of a session, rushing between appointments, or visibly upset is unlikely to produce a productive conversation. Similarly, raising a sensitive issue in a public setting where others can overhear puts the other person on the defensive and makes honest dialogue difficult. The ideal conditions include a private, neutral location, a time when both parties are relatively calm and can dedicate their full attention, sufficient time to have a complete conversation rather than a rushed exchange, and advance notice so the other person is not caught off guard. These conditions communicate respect and increase the likelihood of a constructive outcome.
Several patterns are common among behavior analysts in conflict situations. Over-relying on data and logic while dismissing the emotional dimensions of the disagreement can make the other person feel invalidated. Using jargon or behavioral terminology in interpersonal conflicts can come across as condescending or dehumanizing. Treating the conflict as a problem to be solved rather than an experience to be navigated can lead to premature solution-finding before the other person feels heard. Avoiding conflict entirely out of discomfort, then eventually addressing it in a way that is disproportionate because frustration has accumulated over time, is another common pattern. Awareness of these tendencies allows behavior analysts to deliberately counteract them.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Conflict Resolution: An Essential Skill for Every Leader — Ellie Kazemi · 2 BACB Supervision CEUs · $25
Take This Course →We extended these answers with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind the topic, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
280 research articles with practitioner takeaways
244 research articles with practitioner takeaways
233 research articles with practitioner takeaways
2 BACB Supervision CEUs · $25 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.