The voting rights of adults with intellectual disabilities: reflections on the arguments, and situation in Kenya and England and Wales.
Two countries, two voting doors—Kenya brings the ballot to the person, England/Wales makes the person prove they can open the door.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors compared how Kenya and England/Wales let adults with intellectual disability vote. They read laws, policies, and reports instead of running an experiment.
No people were tested. The paper is a narrative review that maps two very different systems side-by-side.
What they found
Kenya sends trained helpers into villages to register voters and fill out forms for them. England/Wales makes each person prove they understand the vote before they can register.
The study gives no outcome numbers. It only describes the rules.
How this fits with other research
Friedman (2018) shows the same gap between policy and real life in U.S. Medicaid waivers. States say families can direct services, yet they plan for almost zero uptake—just like England/Wales plans for few voters to pass the capacity test.
Bennett et al. (1998) found Welsh adults with severe ID already lived in small staffed houses, not big hospitals. That service shift makes the English capacity test easier to give in a quiet, familiar place, while Kenya’s mobile drives fit rural areas where large hospitals never existed.
Dubuque (2015) surveyed U.S. families who battle SSI paperwork. The same paperwork burden appears in both voting systems: Kenya simplifies it with helpers, England/Wales adds a legal hearing.
Why it matters
If you serve adults with ID, check which voting rules apply in your state. You may need to schedule extra time to explain the ballot or to arrange a capacity assessment. Copy Kenya’s helper model by bringing a picture ballot to the day program, or copy England/Wales by keeping simple documentation that the person can choose. Either way, you turn a policy paper into real access next election.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Role-play a simple ballot choice during lunch: apple vs. juice, then cast and count the votes.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Article 29 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities guarantees equality of political rights, including the right to vote and stand for election. The affirmation of these rights, first guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, raises an important question given the long-standing association between political rights and beliefs concerning the abilities of citizens to reason and act independently: how and to what degree can people identified as having intellectual disabilities participate in a defining act of the democratic process? Focused specifically on the right to vote, this paper addresses the question by (1) introducing the debates that have surrounded the voting rights of this population; and (2) reporting on recent attempts in Kenya, and in England and Wales, to promote voting by people with intellectual disabilities. It concludes by considering the effectiveness of the different approaches these countries have adopted.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2012 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01635.x