The timing of exposure in clinic-based treatment for childhood anxiety disorders.
Start exposure early and finish sooner—clinic data show anxious kids still improve with briefer CBT.
01Research in Context
What this study did
McGeown et al. (2013) watched 28 anxious kids in a regular outpatient clinic. The team gave them CBT but started exposure tasks sooner and kept the whole plan shorter than the big manuals.
They tracked who stayed in care and how anxious kids felt after. No extra lab visits or long wait lists—just real-world therapy speed.
What they found
Kids got better faster. Drop-out looked like other clinic studies, not like the long trials.
Large anxiety drops showed up even though treatment took less time. Early exposure did not scare families away.
How this fits with other research
Amore et al. (2011) seems to disagree. They say family CBT beats solo CBT when kids also show ASD traits. The key gap is the kids: R’s sample had typical development, so brief solo work still won.
Bilek et al. (2023) adds a teen twist. They kept early exposure but tacked on self-distancing talk. Effects were tiny, showing the core is still the exposure, not the add-on.
Laugeson et al. (2014) review backs the big picture: CBT for youth anxiety works, and R’s clinic-speed version lands inside that window.
Why it matters
You can move exposure to session one or two and still see strong gains. For most clinic-referred anxious kids this means fewer visits, lower cost, and faster relief. Try writing “exposure task” on your first session plan instead of week six. Watch if the child stays and if anxiety drops—R’s data say it will.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Move the first in-vivo exposure to the initial visit and track session-by-session anxiety ratings.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The present study examines treatment length and timing of exposure from two child anxiety disorders clinics. Data regarding symptoms and treatment characteristics for 28 youth were prospectively obtained through self, parent, and therapist report at each session. Information regarding length of treatment, timing of exposure initiation, and drop-out rates were compared with those obtained through efficacy and effectiveness trials of manualized treatment for anxious youth. Findings from the authors' clinical data revealed significantly shorter treatment duration with exposures implemented sooner than in the previous studies. Dropout rates were significantly higher than in the efficacy trial but comparable with the effectiveness trial. Outcome data from a subset of eight patients revealed large effect sizes. These findings suggest that effective treatment can be shorter and more focused on exposure than is often outlined in manuals and have important implications for outcome research and dissemination.
Behavior modification, 2013 · doi:10.1177/0145445512456546