Service Delivery

The challenge of technology transfer: Buying in without selling out.

Pennypacker (1986) · The Behavior analyst 1986
★ The Verdict

ABA must market its proven tools with hard data or watch inferior programs take the clients.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who own or manage practices and want more referrals
✗ Skip if RBTs focused only on direct therapy

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Pennypacker (1986) wrote a think piece, not an experiment. The paper asks one question: why do great ABA tools stay stuck in small labs?

The author says behavior analysts must treat their science like a product. Enter the market, track sales, and adjust fast.

02

What they found

The field was losing. Without active marketing, bogus treatments beat out data-based ones.

Survival means selling results without selling values. Measure impact in dollars and lives, then publish the numbers.

03

How this fits with other research

Saunders et al. (2005) picks up the same baton and runs farther. They say, "Don't stop at the market—go public health."

Malott (2004) moves the game plan overseas. Plant funded pioneers in foreign universities and let local contingencies do the rest.

Whalon et al. (2019) adds guardrails. Sell, but do it ethically and with a clear dissemination plan.

Together these papers form a relay: sell (1986) → scale (2005) → globalize (2004) → ethics check (2019).

04

Why it matters

If you run an ABA clinic, you are already in the market. Track referral sources like data points. Post real outcome graphs on social media. Pitch to school districts with cost-per-problem-behavior-saved. Selling without selling out simply means letting your data do the talking.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one graph of client gains to your website or next parent packet.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Highly effective technologies flowing from the discipline of behavior analysis have not been widely adopted, thus threatening the survival of the discipline itself. An analysis of the contingencies underlying successful technology transfer suggests the need for direct, empirical involvement in the marketplace in order to insure that the maximum demonstrable benefits reach the ultimate users. A successful example of this strategy of technology transfer is provided. Three areas of intense national concern-urban violence, illiteracy, and declining industrial productivity-provide immediate opportunities for the technologies of behavior analysis to secure the place of the discipline in the intellectual mosaic of the 21st century.

The Behavior analyst, 1986 · doi:10.1007/BF03391940