Staffing trends of disability care institutions in Taiwan during the period 2002-2007.
Taiwan's disability homes hired 21 percent more staff yet still hover at one worker per six clients, so growth in headcount barely kept pace with demand.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Fang et al. (2009) counted every paid worker in Taiwan's disability institutions for six years. They used government records from 2002-2007. No interviews, no surveys—just hard payroll numbers.
What they found
Staff grew 21 percent, but the client load grew too. The ratio stayed stuck near one worker for every six residents. Educator jobs made up the biggest slice of the payroll.
How this fits with other research
Yen et al. (2009) looked at the same Taiwan files and saw client numbers jump 35 percent. More clients explain why the staff ratio barely moved even after hiring sped up.
Lin (2009) stretched the timeline back to 2000. Registered intellectual disability cases climbed even faster than the general population. That rising denominator sets the stage for Wen-Hui's flat ratio.
C-Pitetti et al. (2007) studied the earlier window 1999-2002. They warned that institutional residents with ID already had high hospital use. Wen-Hui shows the system answered by adding bodies, not shrinking caseloads.
Why it matters
If you consult for large residential programs, expect pressure to keep the 1:6 ratio. Use these Taiwan numbers as a benchmark when you write staffing bids or justify new hires. Push for ratio targets that match client acuity, not just last year's census.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pull your facility's daily census and staff roster, then calculate your current ratio to see how close you sit to the Taiwan benchmark.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The objectives of this study were to examine trends related to the staffing of disability welfare institutions caring for people with disabilities in Taiwan. Nationwide data from the 2002 to 2007 "Service Manpower in Disability Welfare Institutions" report, which are derived mainly from the Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan, were analyzed. The data included number of workers, job type and gender distribution of staff working in welfare institutions catering for the disabled. We also used the disabled population and those who had been admitted to institutional care to analyze the service load per staff member. Based on analyses of current governmental statistics, the results showed that staff numbers in institutions for the disabled increased from 6191 to 7820 (20.8% increase), and the female/male ratio these staff increased from 4.18 to 4.51 from 2002 to 2007. Educator/training personnel (33.3-36.7%) accounted for a higher proportion of staff than other job categories, and each staff member served 5.8-6.3 persons with disabilities on average. The second largest group was living assistant (18.4-20.5%; 9.9-11.8), and the remaining personnel were administrative staff (13.5-14.6%; 13.9-15.9), nursing staff (6.4-8.7%; 24.9-32.0), social workers (6.2-7.5%; 28.8-32.8), and counseling staff (3.8-6.3%; 21.9-57.1). Curve estimation tests showed a significant change over the period of the study in the number of disabled people attended to on average by administrative staff, social workers, nurses and other staff. The results highlight the requirement for further study to explore the needs of the majority service provider--female staff--to provide them with adequate professional or psychological support to enable them to work with people with disabilities in institutions. In addition, further analysis should focus on a review of staff numbers for different types of institutions, to examine their adequacy.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2009 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.003