Service Delivery

Neurocognitive outcomes in adolescents with and without four weeks of cannabis abstinence: a randomized clinical trial using contingency management

Schuster et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry 2025
★ The Verdict

Paying teens for clean urine for one month improved their ability to stop impulsive actions.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running teen substance-use programs in clinics or via telehealth.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only treat adults or non-substance-related cases.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Schuster et al. (2025) asked teens with cannabis use disorder to stay clean for four weeks. Half the teens got a token system: each clean urine earned points they could swap for gift cards. The other half only got drug tests and check-ins.

All teens took computer tests of memory, attention, and the ability to stop a wrong action. The team wanted to know if paid abstinence would sharpen thinking skills.

02

What they found

The paid-abstinence group got better at stopping impulsive clicks. Memory and attention scores did not move. The gain was small but real compared with the teens who were only watched.

In short, money for clean urine helped teens think before they hit the button.

03

How this fits with other research

Goldman et al. (1979) did something similar with adults who drank too much coffee. They paid people to cut caffeine week by week. Coffee drinking dropped two-thirds and stayed down for almost a year. The same simple idea—cash for less drug—works across ages and drugs.

Fradet et al. (2025) and Chan et al. (2025) also ran remote teen RCTs, but they used mindfulness and parent groups instead of money. All three 2025 studies show you can reach teens through screens and still move clinical numbers. Schuster adds the piece that concrete rewards, not just calm breathing, can change behavior and brain scores.

No clash here: mindfulness helps mood, tokens help drug abstinence and self-control. Use the right tool for the target.

04

Why it matters

If you work with teens who use cannabis, you now have an easy telehealth plan: urine test, instant gift-card points, and a quick game to track self-control. The money keeps them clean long enough for the brain to practice stopping. You can start Monday with a $5 e-gift code and a laptop go/no-go task.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a $5 gift-card contingency for each negative urine and track stop-signal reaction time on a free computer task.

02At a glance

Intervention
token economy
Design
randomized controlled trial
Sample size
238
Population
substance use disorder
Finding
positive
Magnitude
small

03Original abstract

As adolescent cannabis use becomes more common, questions remain about the potential for neurocognitive recovery after stopping cannabis use. This study examined whether short-term abstinence from cannabis leads to cognitive improvements. A total of 238 adolescents (ages 13–19; 51% female; 55% White, 18% Black, 9% Asian, 18% other races) from Greater Boston participated, including 154 adolescents who regularly used cannabis (CB) and 84 adolescents with no cannabis use (NU). Participants who used cannabis were randomized to incentivized abstinence (CB-Abst) or a non-contingent monitoring control (CB-Mon). Non-users completed four weeks of monitoring (NU). Participants completed tests of executive function, memory, and attention weekly for four weeks. At baseline, CB adolescents demonstrated worse verbal memory and processing speed than NU on (p <.006). CB-Abst performance was similar to that of the NU group at week 4. At week 4, those in the CB-Abst group showed greater improvements in inhibitory control compared to the CB-Mon group (β = -10.9, p = .037). There were no significant differences between CB groups in memory or attention task performance at week 4. Exploratory analyses revealed modest gains across all groups in some tasks. Brief cannabis abstinence may be associated with improvements in executive function among adolescents, supporting the idea of neurocognitive recovery, which has important implications for treatment, prevention, and public health policies.

Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2025 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1723633