Service Delivery

Increasing appointment keeping by reducing the call-appointment interval.

Benjamin-Bauman et al. (1984) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1984
★ The Verdict

Cut the wait: scheduling patients within one week (or next day) slashes no-shows compared with standard 2-3 week delays.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running outpatient clinics, early-intervention offices, or any center with long waitlists.
✗ Skip if School-based BCBAs who see kids on fixed IEP calendars.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

A hospital clinic moved patients up the calendar. Instead of waiting three weeks, kids got seen in one week. Some kids even got next-day slots.

Staff tracked every family for nine months. They counted who showed up and who stayed home.

02

What they found

Short waits doubled attendance. One-week slots lifted show-ups from a large share to a large share. Next-day slots hit a large share.

Long waits lost half the families. Three-week slots kept only a large share of appointments.

03

How this fits with other research

Billings et al. (1985) ran the same clinic one year later. They kept short waits and added mailed reminders plus a free parking pass. No-shows fell even more, proving the two fixes stack.

Wilkie et al. (1981) used a cheap lottery to cut employee driving. Like Pear et al. (1984), they changed a small antecedent and got big behavior change. Both studies show low-cost tweaks beat fancy rewards.

Bigby et al. (2009) trimmed medication errors with staff training and a supply box. All three papers—Pear et al. (1984), Billings et al. (1985), and Bigby et al. (2009)—share one theme: streamline the system first, then watch problems shrink.

04

Why it matters

You can copy this today. Open your schedule, slide new clients into the first open slot, even if it’s tomorrow. One week or less keeps families engaged and cuts wasted hours. No extra staff, no cost—just faster service.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Move every new client on your waitlist into the first open appointment slot within seven days.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Population
not specified
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

We examined the effect of reducing the interval between a patient's call for an appointment and the appointment itself. In Experiment 1, patients calling a family planning unit of a public health department were assigned appointments within either 1 or 3 weeks of their call. Data on patient "shows" and "no-shows" were recorded weekly for 6 weeks. Show rates for those in the 1-week appointment group were significantly higher than those in the 3-week group. In Experiment 2, patients were assigned to appointment dates either the next operating clinic day (next-day group) or 2 weeks from the call date (2-week group). Show rates for those in the next-day group were significantly better than show rates for patients in the 2-week group. Clinic productivity, time spent with patients, and consumer satisfaction were also assessed. Implications for appointment scheduling are discussed.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1984 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-295