Service Delivery

Group Procedures for Decreasing Problem Behavior Displayed by Detained Adolescents.

McDougale et al. (2019) · Behavior modification 2019
★ The Verdict

Fixed-time attention plus short rules with group rewards cut problem behavior and improved line walking for detained adolescents.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running group homes, juvenile halls, or alternative school transitions.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working with single clients in clinic rooms or home settings.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers tested a group plan with detained teens. The plan gave attention on a fixed schedule plus short rules with rewards.

They ran the test during daily line-ups and moves. Kids earned group rewards for following rules and keeping problem acts low.

02

What they found

Problem behavior dropped. The teens also walked lines faster and quieter.

When staff cut the attention schedule to half-time, good behavior held. The simple package kept working even on a leaner plan.

03

How this fits with other research

Cissne et al. (2026) later flipped the contingency target. They rewarded staff, not youth, via a Kudos board. Resident problem behavior still fell, showing the setting can improve from either angle.

Macdonald et al. (1973) let youths judge peers in a 1970s token house. Both studies use group systems, but the new one adds fixed-time attention before any rule is broken, a gentler start.

Joslyn et al. (2024) used hidden, independent group rewards in a classroom. Both papers slip attention or rewards without waiting for trouble, a shared non-contingent core that keeps kids calm.

04

Why it matters

You can copy the package Monday. Give brief attention every 30 s during transitions, post two clear rules, and let the group earn a quick reward for meeting them. No extra staff, no tokens, just a timer and praise. Try it at dorm lines, cafeteria queues, or school halls with any tough teen group.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Set a 30-s timer, give quick praise to the whole group, and post two transition rules with a shared reward for compliance.

02At a glance

Intervention
group contingencies
Design
case series
Population
not specified
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

As one component of providing treatment in a residential facility, Brogan, Falligant, and Rapp decreased problem behavior by two groups of detained adolescents using group contingency procedures. The current series of studies evaluated the extent to which group procedures could be extended to other contexts within a residential facility. In Study 1, fixed-time delivery of attention by dormitory staff decreased problem behavior displayed by a group of five to 11 detained adolescents during free periods. In Study 2, rules from a therapist plus contingencies for following those rules increased appropriate line walking during specific transition periods. Subsequently, rules alone maintained appropriate line walking, however, direct training was required to produce appropriate line walking during other transitions. Measures of social validity indicated the procedures and outcomes in both studies were acceptable to facility personnel.

Behavior modification, 2019 · doi:10.1177/0145445518781314