Family Experiences with Supplemental Social Security Income and Legal Guardianship for Autistic Adults: A Mixed-Methods Study.
SSI and guardianship ride on ability numbers, not bank accounts, and families drown in red tape you can help untangle.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Ferguson et al. (2025) asked families how they secured two big adult services: SSI cash help and legal guardianship.
They used surveys plus open-ended questions so numbers and stories both show up.
All families had an autistic adult child moving into or already in adulthood.
What they found
IQ and daily-living scores, not family income or race, decided who got SSI and guardianship.
Parents called the steps “a second job” filled with forms, phone tag, and dead ends.
How this fits with other research
Marsack-Topolewski (2020) saw half of aging caregivers use mental-health services while chasing supports; F et al. add that even before aging, SSI paperwork itself becomes the stressor.
Nord et al. (2024) found public insurance linked to job loss for parents; F et al. show SSI rules also force parents to prove low “adaptive” scores, tying the benefit to ability labels rather than money needs—an apparent contradiction that dissolves when you see both studies track different benefits with similar ability-testing hoops.
Cribb et al. (2019) let young adults say they feel “more in control,” yet F et al. reveal families still must file for guardianship to stay in control of housing or medical choices—together the papers map why autonomy feelings and legal control rarely line up.
Why it matters
If you coach transition-age families, prep them early: collect IQ and adaptive scores, then rehearse the SSI interview line by line. Build a checklist that splits guardianship tasks into weekly micro-steps so the “second job” feels doable. Share your checklist with other BCBAs—streamlining bureaucracy is our new intervention.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Start a one-page cheat sheet of needed IQ and adaptive scores for SSI—hand it to every transition family this week.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Family interactions with the Supplemental Social Security Income (SSI) program and the decision to pursue legal guardianship are poorly understood in services research for autistic adults. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study and incorporated quantitative survey data from 122 autistic adults in an existing longitudinal cohort with qualitative interviews with 12 autistic adults and/or legal guardians. We explored associations between sociodemographic, developmental, and behavioral features with the likelihood of having SSI and a legal guardian at 25 years old. Spoken interviews were transcribed verbatim, and interviews were analyzed using a rapid qualitative analytic approach. RESULTS: There were quantitative differences in whether families were able to obtain SSI and guardianship based on intelligence quotient (IQ) scores, adaptive behavior, and autistic characteristics, but not by race, ethnicity, or maternal education. Qualitative data analysis revealed six themes that highlighted the challenges associated with obtaining and maintaining SSI, along with the complex, nuanced decisions associated with legal guardianship. Families noted many challenges in navigating these procedures and some potential benefits for each unique circumstance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings offer new perspectives on experiences associated with pursuing SSI benefits and legal guardianship for autistic adults, including similarities and key differences in these procedures. Findings also provide suggestions for future research to improve coordination and supports for families throughout adulthood.
Research in autism spectrum disorders, 2025 · doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000737