Exploring and building autism service capacity in rural and remote regions: Participatory action research in rural Alberta and British Columbia, Canada.
Let rural stakeholders run the meeting — they will map autism service gaps and own the fix.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Young et al. (2019) ran listening circles with parents, teachers, doctors, and town leaders in rural Alberta and British Columbia. They asked one question: what would it take to grow autism services here?
The team met monthly for a year. They wrote down every idea, sorted them into themes, and checked the themes with the group. This is called participatory action research — the people who need the service help design it.
What they found
Four big levers came up again and again: local champions, shared spaces, joint training, and flexible funding. When a ranch mom or a small-town principal spoke up, others listened. Leadership lived in the room, not in a far-off office.
The study found positive results. Communities left with a clear, co-owned plan to add therapy hours, share staff, and pool equipment.
How this fits with other research
Adams et al. (2024) looked at 11 autism partnership projects and saw most teams stop at ‘we get along.’ Amber’s group went further — they built a work plan and next-step calendar. The 2024 review says sustainability is rarely reported; this 2019 study shows one way to do it.
Elsabbagh et al. (2014) argued we need structured engagement tools. Amber gives a live example: use local meeting rhythms, record on flip-chart paper, and let the community vote on top priorities. The earlier paper set the table; this one eats the meal.
Vassos et al. (2023) scanned 31 transition studies and found equity and autistic voice still missing. Amber’s rural circles included self-advocates and parents at every session, showing how to close that gap in real time.
Why it matters
If you serve rural clients, copy the circle method. Invite the bus driver, the grocery store owner, and the mayor. Ask what one shared resource would help most. Write it where everyone can see. End the meeting with who does what by when. You will leave with a plan, not just goodwill.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Book the town library for one hour, invite three local leaders, and ask, ‘What one step would double autism support here?’
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Based in participatory action research, this project had the aim of building capacity in treatment and support for individuals and families impacted by autism spectrum disorder in remote and rural communities of Canada. Communities were selected based on their rurality and willingness to engage in change efforts for enhanced service delivery within their region. Fifteen discussion groups with key stakeholders were convened in seven communities with ~200 community stakeholders. Based on analyses of these data from the stakeholders, themes were distilled through interpretive description, which in turn were presented to community stakeholders for reflection and collective action. Findings indicate broad thematic domains consisting of: insufficient services, protective factors in community, change efforts via collectivity within community, limitations and benefits of residing in rural communities relative to care associated with autism spectrum disorder, a sense of "community" in rural contexts, and engaging in focused dialogue as a pathway to advancement. Opportunities for building capacity for support in autism spectrum disorder emerged within intersecting layers of leadership, contextual factors, and community collaboration. Consistent with participatory action research principles, emerging local knowledge was supported with strategies for improved autism spectrum disorder service development.
Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2019 · doi:10.1177/1362361318801340