An outcome management program for extending advances in choice research into choice opportunities for supported workers with severe multiple disabilities.
A yearly outcome-management loop keeps job coaches giving daily choices to workers with severe disabilities.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with 12 job coaches in community work sites.
Each coach supported one adult with severe intellectual disability.
They built a simple package: set a daily choice target, train the coach, then give feedback every month for one year.
Choices were small: which task to start, what break to take, or who to work beside.
What they found
Coaches gave more choices every month.
By the end of the year, workers got choices on almost every task.
The gains held steady for the full 12 months.
How this fits with other research
Ferron et al. (2023) updated this idea. They swapped the yearly cycle for daily three-question check-ins plus monthly coaching. Both studies show the same positive trend, so the newer method may save time.
White et al. (1990) and Green et al. (1987) trained the workers themselves to self-monitor. H et al. flipped the focus: train the staff instead. Together they show self-management tools work for both groups.
Hansen et al. (1989) proved individual job placements beat group crews. H et al. shows how to keep those placements high-quality by maintaining staff behavior long-term.
Why it matters
You can lock in daily choice opportunities with a light-touch yearly plan. Pick one clear target, teach the staff, and check in monthly. The worker gets more control, and you prevent drift without daily paperwork.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one worker, set a daily choice target (e.g., offer two task options at 10 a.m.), and schedule a five-minute coach feedback call every month.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We evaluated an outcome management program for increasing choice opportunities provided by 2 job coaches for 5 supported workers with severe multiple disabilities in a community job. The program involved specifying and monitoring behavioral outcomes among workers and staff, training staff, and supportive and corrective feedback. Increased choice provision occurred for both job coaches across a 1-year period. Results indicate how outcome management can help translate advances in choice research into routine practice.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2003 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-575