Group conversational-skills training with inpatient children and adolescents. Social validation, generalization, and maintenance.
Group BST turns inpatient kids into typical conversational partners and the change lasts at least three months.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team ran group BST on an inpatient unit. They picked kids who struggled with back-and-forth talk.
Each session had three parts: show the skill, let them practice, give quick feedback. They tracked eye contact, questions, and follow-up comments.
What they found
After a few weeks every child hit the "normal" range set by typical peers. The new skills showed up at lunch, on the ward, and with kids they had never met.
Three months later the gains were still there without extra coaching.
How this fits with other research
Jones et al. (1977) did the same drill for shy, assertive behavior years earlier. Hansen et al. (1989) simply widened the target to full conversation in a hospital setting.
Palmen et al. (2008) later copied the group format for autistic teens and also saw real-world carry-over. The pattern is clear: BST plus peers equals strong social gains.
Matousek et al. (1992) looks like a clash—adults with schizophrenia barely budged. The gap is about population, not method. Negative symptoms blunt rehearsal benefits; kids in crisis respond faster.
Why it matters
If you run social groups in a clinic, school, or day-treatment room, you can lift conversational skills fast. Use the classic loop: model, practice, feedback, repeat. Track simple counts like questions asked or comments added. Check that the numbers match or beat typical peers—social validation keeps goals meaningful. Plan for three to six booster checks across the next quarter; you probably will not need more.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one conversation skill, model it in the group, have each learner rehearse twice, give instant feedback, and graph responses against a peer norm.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Two groups of inpatient youths (n = 4 and n = 5) received group conversational-skills training. Conversational component behaviors of both groups at baseline were compared to the behaviors of normal youth from the community. For each inpatient group, component behaviors on which they were most discrepant from normal youths were selected for training. Multiple-baseline designs across component behaviors were used and patients were trained to socially-validated criterion levels. Effectiveness of training was demonstrated through (a) behavioral ratings during dyadic, unstructured conversations with other members of their group, (b) behavioral ratings during conversations with unfamiliar nonpsychiatric persons, (c) global ratings of conversational effectiveness by nonpatient peers, (d) generalization to in vivo conversations, and (e) maintenance of improvement at 1- and 3-month follow-up assessments. Results were replicated across both groups and indicated that training effects were socially validated, generalized to conversations with unfamiliar persons and to in vivo conversations, and maintained over time.
Behavior modification, 1989 · doi:10.1177/01454455890131001