An initial evaluation of staff injuries in human service organizations
Arm bites are the everyday injury in autism agencies, and simple first-aid is usually enough—if you report it.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Ruby et al. (2024) sent a survey to staff in autism service agencies. They asked who got hurt, how, and what care was needed.
The survey was the first to count client-to-staff injuries in these settings.
What they found
Bites on the arm were the top injury. Most wounds needed only on-site first aid.
Client-to-staff contact caused nearly all reported hurts.
How this fits with other research
Lemons et al. (2015) showed many carers lack risk-assessment training. Ruby’s team now shows the result: bites happen anyway.
Bottini et al. (2020) found workload and poor supervision drive burnout. Add physical bites and you see why staff leave.
Fields et al. (1991) saw staff using strong aversives feel more accomplished. Ruby flips the view: clients can still injure you even when you follow plan.
Why it matters
You can’t train empathy if your arm is in a bandage. Start each case with a bite-risk checklist. Ask: does the client have a history of arm-bites? If yes, wear long sleeves, keep a buffer, and teach replacement behavior first. Track every nip. One logged bite today can earn protective gear tomorrow.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one line to your session note: ‘Any bite attempt? Y/N’ and email the tally each Friday.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
AbstractRecent data reveal an increase in the likelihood of staff injury for those working in the health care and social assistance industries (United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2021). Without information summarizing variables pertaining to staff injury in behavior‐analytic service settings, organizational leaders risk the safety of staff they employ. Despite the social relevance, few studies concerning the types of client‐related staff injuries have been published. The purpose of this survey was to gather data on the cause, type, bodily location of, and treatment required for staff injury by surveying organizations that serve individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Respondents ranked the leading cause of injury as client‐to‐staff interactions, type of injury as bite, location of injury as arm, and the most common treatment required as on‐site first aid. These initial data could assist in the identification of job tasks that may be associated with increased risk of injury, potential ramifications of client‐inflicted injuries on staff performance and organizational outcomes, and how to address injuries in settings within an injury‐prone industry. Implications and future research ideas are also discussed.
Behavioral Interventions, 2024 · doi:10.1002/bin.1976