Service Delivery

An experimental analysis of anti-litter procedures.

Burgess et al. (1971) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1971
★ The Verdict

Pay kids right away for each piece of litter and they will clean 90% of it—signs and trash cans can’t touch that.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running community outings, school events, or camp programs.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only work in one-to-one desk settings.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team tested four ways to stop litter in two movie theaters. They tried extra trash cans, warning signs, a short film, and a kid-friendly token plan. Kids could trade collected litter for candy, soda, or toys right away.

Each method ran on different days. Staff counted litter before and after shows. The token plan was the only one that paid kids for results.

02

What they found

The token plan removed over 90% of litter. Trash cans, signs, and the film barely helped. Kids worked fast because the reward was immediate and sure.

The result stayed strong across both theaters. No other trick came close.

03

How this fits with other research

Clark et al. (1972) copied the idea in a forest campground. They let kids pick their own prizes. Litter still dropped fast, showing the theater trick travels outdoors.

Hayes et al. (1975) made the job even easier. They pre-marked litter and paid only for those pieces. Their marked-item method kept 55–88% of litter off the ground with less staff work. It builds on Burgess et al. (1971) by trimming the time adults spend watching.

Bacon-Prue et al. (1980) moved the same marked-item plan into a home for adults with intellectual disability. Tokens plus a dollar and a photo on the wall beat both trash cans and paid clean-up crews. The 1971 kid trick works for adults too.

04

Why it matters

You now have a cheap, fast tool that beats passive fixes like signs or extra bins. Pick a small, clear target, deliver the reward on the spot, and watch the litter disappear. Try it Monday at your clinic picnic, school fair, or park outing—just bring a bag of tokens and a few favorite snacks.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Hand each child a small bag and one token per litter item; trade tokens for candy at the end of the trip.

02At a glance

Intervention
token economy
Design
alternating treatments
Population
neurotypical
Finding
strongly positive
Magnitude
very large

03Original abstract

This study evaluates the differential effectiveness of six different anti-litter procedures in two neighborhood theaters. The procedures used to encourage individuals in attendance to pick up litter and deposit it properly included: providing litterbags, providing litterbags with instructions to use them, providing extra trash cans, showing a special anti-litter film before the feature film, and providing incentives for the appropriate deposit of litter. In both theaters, the incentive procedures resulted in the removal of over 90% of all litter by the children in attendance, a figure far above that achieved by the other procedures investigated.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1971 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1971.4-71