School & Classroom

"They don't have a good life if we keep thinking that they're doing it on purpose!": Teachers' Perspectives on the Well-Being of Students with Autism.

Danker et al. (2019) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2019
★ The Verdict

High-school teachers say peer ties, safety, and engagement make or break well-being for students with autism—now we have trials that show how to build each piece.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing high-school autism supports who need quick, teacher-approved targets.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on clinic-based early-intervention cases.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Danker et al. (2019) talked with 20 high-school teachers about what well-being looks like for students with autism.

The teachers built a picture with three big parts: good peer ties, feeling safe, and staying engaged in class.

Interviews were coded into a grounded-theory map that shows barriers and boosts for each part.

02

What they found

Teachers say kids do best when they have friends, feel physically and emotionally safe, and take part in lessons.

Staff warned that thinking “he’s doing it on purpose” hurts well-being because blame replaces support.

The model gives schools a clear lens: watch peer groups, safety cues, and engagement levels.

03

How this fits with other research

Bertschy et al. (2020) asked autistic students the same question and heard the same three wishes: more friends, more care, more safety. The match is a conceptual replication from the pupil side.

Bao et al. (2017) went further and tested peer-network clubs. Social initiations rose for every teen, proving the teacher call for “good peer ties” can be built with a simple lunch-bunch plan.

Manning et al. (2026) and Zakai-Mashiach (2025) seem to clash—autistic youth recall school as the least safe place. The gap is viewpoint: teachers describe what supports safety, while students report how rare it feels. Both agree safety is pivotal; the data simply show we have not delivered it yet.

04

Why it matters

Use the three-point checklist in your next IEP: peer network, safety scan, engagement probe. Pick one peer club, one calming spot, and one choice-based task this week. When staff blame behavior, replay the quote: “They don’t have a good life if we keep thinking they’re doing it on purpose.” Reframe, then support.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one student, set up a three-peer lunch club, and train the group to greet him by name before the bell rings.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
qualitative
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

In recent years, student well-being is increasingly on the research agenda. Yet, little is known about the well-being of students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The current study used semi-structured interviews and sought the views of 20 high school teachers of students with ASD to investigate the concept of well-being for this group of students. Grounded theory approaches were used to analyse the data. Teachers conceptualised well-being as consisting of three domains (i.e., peer relationships, sense of safety, engagement), identified three categories of barriers (i.e., teacher's ability to effectively teach students with ASD, impact of ASD, environment), and several external and internal assets of well-being. Discussion on recommended practices for schools to enhance the well-being of students with ASD are provided.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2019 · doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1311-0