Self-selection of standards by children: The relative effectiveness of pupil-selected and teacher-selected standards of performance.
Letting each child pick their own daily academic goal beats teacher-assigned goals in a token economy.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The researchers asked: Who should pick the daily goal in a classroom token economy?
They split elementary classes into three groups. One group chose their own math and writing targets. The second group got teacher-set targets. The third group had no token system at all.
Every correct answer earned a point. Points traded for small prizes.
What they found
Kids who picked their own goals finished more correct problems than both other groups.
The boost showed up in writing and in math. Teacher-set goals helped a little, but self-set goals helped more.
How this fits with other research
Ballard et al. (1975) tried the same idea six years earlier. Grade-3 pupils set story-length goals and rewarded themselves. Stories got longer and better. Parsons et al. (1981) now shows the trick also works with math and with a teacher-run token store.
Einfeld et al. (1995) and Rasing et al. (1992) used token systems too, but they added response-cost for kids with attention problems. Their focus was behavior, not goal ownership. Together the four papers map two paths: let kids set the goal, or add a penalty for lapses. You can pick the path that matches your class needs.
Why it matters
If you run a token economy, pause before you post the daily target. Ask the learner, "How many do you think you can get right today?" Write their answer on the score sheet and pay points for hitting it. The thirty-second chat can raise correct work without extra prizes or tougher tasks.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Ask each student to name their own correct-answer goal for the day; pay tokens only for that self-selected number.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study examines the effects of contingent reinforcement under conditions of pupil-selected and teacher-selected performance standards upon pupils' academic response rates. The academic response rate was measured by the number of correct responses emitted per session. Thirty pupils (15 second-graders and 15 third-graders) were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups, based on matched triplets. One group worked under pupil-selected standards; the second group worked under standards selected by the experimenter with each pupil yoked to a member of the pupil-selected standards groups. Both groups participated in the calculation of their daily earnings. The third group served as a no-contingency control group. Baseline academic response rates on writing and math tasks were determined. During the experimental sessions reinforcement was provided in the form of points which were later traded for tangible rewards. The pupil-selected standards group showed a significantly greater number of correct responses in the writing and math tasks than the externally selected standards group.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1981 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-425