Instructing beginning teachers in reinforcement procedures which improve classroom control.
Simple teacher-run contingencies—attention, a game, and shorter breaks—quickly raise study behavior and drop disruption.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three new teachers tried a classroom game. When kids stayed on task, the teacher gave praise and let them keep playing.
If the class got rowdy, the teacher stopped the game and cut break time short. The researchers flipped these rules on and off four times to see what happened.
What they found
Each time the rules were in place, kids studied more and acted out less. When the rules stopped, the problems came back. The changes were big and fast.
How this fits with other research
Sanders et al. (1971) later used the same idea with third-graders. They swapped the game for a play area: finish work, go play. Both studies show that letting the teacher control free time keeps kids working.
Laposa et al. (2017) moved the trick into a juvenile lock-up. Teens managed their own DRL plan and still hit near-zero swearing. It shows the same logic works even when students, not teachers, hold the leash.
TCruz-Montecinos et al. (2024) ran a pure DRL group plan with autistic boys. They used the same ABAB flip design and also cut noise. The method travels across diagnoses and decades.
Why it matters
You do not need fancy tools. Praise, a game, and shorter breaks can flip a classroom in one period. Try pairing these three levers the next time you coach a new teacher or design a class-wide plan.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one class period, set a 5-minute timer, and give a team point every time you see on-task behavior; take a minute off break if noise rises above a quiet line.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Systematic reinforcement procedures were used to increase study behavior in the classrooms of three beginning teachers experiencing problems of classroom control. Classroom study rates were recorded during a baseline period. During subsequent experimental periods, the teachers changed one or more reinforcement contingencies (teacher attention, length of between-period break, a classroom game) to bring about increased study rates and concomitant reductions in disruptive behaviors. A brief reversal period, in which these contingencies were discontinued, again produced low rates of study. Reinstatement of the contingencies resulted once again in marked increases in study behaviors.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1968 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-315