School & Classroom

"Everybody Wants to be Included": Experiences with 'Inclusive' Strategies in Physical Education.

Holland et al. (2023) · Journal of developmental and physical disabilities 2023
★ The Verdict

Standard inclusive PE tricks can backfire—ask each student what really makes them feel included.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing or overseeing PE goals for students with orthopedic or mobility needs.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only work in clinic or home settings with no school PE component.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Ledbetter-Cho et al. (2023) talked with students who have orthopedic disabilities about gym class.

They asked what so-called "inclusive" tricks, like parallel games or helper peers, felt like to the kids.

The study used open interviews so students could tell their own story.

02

What they found

Kids said the same move could make them feel part of the group one day and singled out the next.

One-size-fits-all fixes often backfired; only personal tweaks made them truly included.

03

How this fits with other research

Chandroo et al. (2020) heard the same thing from students with autism: transition plans look inclusive on paper, yet kids had almost no say.

Bassette et al. (2023) surveyed 199 UK staff and found role confusion and scant training; staff agreed they need Down-syndrome-specific prep to make inclusion real.

All three studies echo each other: policies claim inclusion, but students still feel sidelined until you ask each person what they actually need.

04

Why it matters

Before your next PE session, ask the learner, "What helps you feel part of the game?" Then shape the activity around that answer instead of using a generic adaptation.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Interview your student for five minutes and test one personally chosen PE modification next class.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
qualitative
Sample size
6
Population
other
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

This study examined how students with orthopedic impairments experienced strategies identified in the literature to support 'inclusion'. An interpretative phenomenological analysis research approach was used, and six students with orthopedic impairments (age 10-14 years) served as participants. Data sources were written prompts, semi-structured, audiotaped interviews, and reflective interview notes. Based on thematic data analysis, four themes were constructed: "It's kind of embarrassing": experiences with support; "I don't want to be different": equipment, activity, and rule modifications; "I like to be a part of the conversation": autonomy and choice in PE; and "I would rather be like the other students": discussing disability. The experiences portrayed through these themes highlighted the differential effects of these explicated strategies, where each strategy contributed to feelings of inclusion, as well as marginalization among participants. As such, the findings indicated that 'inclusive' strategies should not be considered as blanket recommendations; instead, attempts to promote 'inclusion' of students with disabilities should start with a reflexive look at the unique needs of each individual student.

Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2023 · doi:10.1080/08870440008400302