Efficacy and maintenance of an education program for a consumer cooperative.
Small credits and fines can multiply student work and keep a cooperative program alive for years without staff.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers set up a credit and fine system in a student-run food co-op.
Members earned credits for finishing study guides and paid small fines for skipping.
They used an ABAB reversal design to test the rules.
The co-op had about 30 college-age members.
What they found
When credits and fines were on, study-guide completion jumped five times higher.
When the rules were off, work dropped back to baseline.
Nine years later the students still ran the same system with no staff help.
How this fits with other research
Kohlenberg et al. (1976) did something similar in a group home. Rent credits for chores boosted work and saved money. The co-op study shows the same credit/fine logic works for school work.
Potter et al. (2013) paid homeless adults cash for attending job training. Payments doubled attendance, just like credits multiplied guide completion. The pattern holds across ages and settings.
Robinson et al. (1974) warned that fines can backfire by excluding people. The co-op avoided this by keeping fines small and letting members earn credits right away.
Why it matters
You can run a credit/fine system with almost no cost. Post the rules, hand out cheap tokens, and watch participation climb. After a few weeks the students may keep it going themselves, freeing you to focus on other goals. Try it in student councils, peer-tutoring rooms, or life-skills classes where members share real work.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Post a daily chart: add a star for each finished worksheet, erase one for each skip, and let stars buy five minutes of free time Friday.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We examined the effects of contingency management on participation in and maintenance of an education program by new members of a student housing cooperative. With credit and fine contingencies in place, the percentage of participants completing study guides was five times higher than without the contingencies. Members continued to implement the program for 9 years without researcher involvement.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1993 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1993.26-403