Effects of differential reinforcement and time‐out on the unsafe playground behavior of young children
A 30–60 s time-out can turn weak DRO into strong playground safety without hurting peer time.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Linton et al. (2025) watched four preschoolers on a public playground.
The kids kept climbing the slide the wrong way or jumping from high spots.
First the team used DRO: if a child played safely for two minutes, he got praise and a sticker.
When DRO barely helped three kids, the teachers added a brief time-out: 30–60 seconds on a bench.
What they found
DRO alone cut unsafe play for only one child.
After the tiny time-out was added, unsafe acts almost vanished for the other three.
Kids still played with friends and still said recess was fun.
How this fits with other research
Cohen et al. (1990) saw the same pattern with two adults who hit themselves.
DRO plus reprimands did little; adding Movement Suppression Time-out worked.
The two studies line up across ages and settings: when safety is on the line, DRO often needs a quick penalty booster.
Byrne et al. (2000) shows the other side: one adult with brain injury dropped aggression 74% with DRO alone.
The difference is risk level: playground falls and self-injury can bring instant harm, so a faster suppressor helps.
Why it matters
If you run recess or park groups and DRO is barely denting risky climbing, add a 30-second sit-out.
No extra toys or tokens are needed, and the kids still enjoy recess.
Try it next week; one minute on the bench can save a trip to the nurse.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick the riskiest child, set a two-minute DRO timer, and add a 30-second bench time-out after each unsafe act.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) on reducing unsafe playground behavior of young children at school and subsequently, if necessary, the additive effects of a brief time-out. The DRO procedure was effective in eliminating unsafe behavior for one of four participants. The other three participants experienced the addition of a time-out procedure in combination with DRO. The DRO + TO condition nearly eliminated unsafe playground behavior for all three participants who experienced the condition. Additionally, the addition of time-out did not negatively affect social interactions among peers or self-reported recess enjoyment for any participant who experienced time-out. Following experience with all conditions, participants selected the condition they would experience via a concurrent-chains preference assessment. All three participants selected an intervention condition at every opportunity, and two of three participants selected DRO + TO most often.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2025 · doi:10.1002/jaba.70009