Effects of ethanol on reinforced variations and repetitions by rats under a multiple schedule.
Alcohol selectively breaks rigid, repeated response chains while sparing flexible variation in both rats and humans.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Cohen et al. (1990) gave rats two simple jobs.
Press one lever in the same order every time.
Press a second lever in any new order each time.
After each job the rats got food.
Then the team injected some ethanol and watched what broke.
What they found
Alcohol wrecked the repeated job.
The rats could not copy the same lever order.
But the varied job stayed fine.
The rats still made new sequences and earned food.
Ethanol hurt repetition, not variation.
How this fits with other research
Higgins et al. (1992) moved the test to college students.
Alcohol slowed their learning and dropped accuracy.
Both studies show ethanol muddles practiced, rule-bound work.
Demello et al. (1992) tested human aggression under alcohol.
Higher work requirements cut aggression, and alcohol made that cut bigger.
Again, ethanol magnifies the cost of sticking to a strict plan.
Across rats and people, alcohol loosens rigid response chains.
Why it matters
Your learners with tight, rote chains may slump after a late night or new meds.
Check repetition tasks first; they drop before creative ones.
If a child suddenly cannot do a mastered routine, look at sleep, diet, or medication that acts like alcohol on the brain.
Build in response variation drills as a backup; they survive when repetition fails.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Probe a mastered chain and a novel variation task after any suspected sedating event; note which one falters first.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Response sequences emitted by five Long-Evans rats were reinforced under a two-component multiple schedule. In the REPEAT component, food pellets were contingent upon completion of a left-left-right-right (LLRR) sequence on two levers. In the VARY component, pellets were contingent upon variable sequences (i.e., a sequence was reinforced only if it differed from each of the previous five sequences). The rats learned to emit LLRR sequences in the REPEAT component and variable sequences in VARY. Intraperitoneal injections of ethanol (1.25, 1.75, and 2.25 g/kg) significantly increased sequence variability in REPEAT, thereby lowering reinforcement probability, but had little effect on sequence variability in the VARY component. These results extend previous findings that alcohol impairs the performance of reinforced repetitions but not of reinforced variations in response sequences.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1990 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1990.54-1