School & Classroom

A comparison of three methods for eliminating disruptive lunchroom behavior.

MacPherson et al. (1974) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1974
★ The Verdict

Having kids write a short 'I messed up and here is how I will fix it' essay right after lunch nearly erased disruption in fourth and fifth graders.

✓ Read this if BCBAs helping teachers manage cafeteria or hallway behavior in elementary schools.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working with toddlers or non-speaking students who cannot write sentences yet.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The researchers tested three ways to stop loud, out-of-seat lunchroom behavior in fourth and fifth graders. They used an alternating-treatments design. Each day kids got either basic rules, basic rules plus punishment essays, or basic rules plus short 'mediation' essays they wrote themselves.

The mediation essay asked kids to name what they did wrong and how it hurt others. Kids wrote it right after lunch if they broke a rule. The study ran during normal school lunch periods.

02

What they found

Adding the student-written mediation essay almost wiped out disruption. Basic rules alone helped a little. Punishment essays helped a bit more. Mediation essays beat both by a wide margin.

The effect showed up fast and stayed strong across the whole study.

03

How this fits with other research

Fiene et al. (2015) looked at 18 single-case studies on behavior contracts and found a solid, mid-size benefit. Their meta-analysis covers contracts that reward or fine tokens, similar to the basic rules used here. The 1974 mediation essay gives an even bigger drop in problems, suggesting the reflective writing piece adds extra power.

Tracey et al. (1974) ran in the same year and also used fourth graders. They compared reward tokens versus cost tokens. Both token styles worked equally well. The mediation essay outperformed their best token result, showing a free, low-prep writing task can beat buying and managing tokens.

McKenna et al. (2017) moved the same lunchroom-disruption goal into today's classrooms but used function-based replacement training for individual kids. Their approach cut problem behavior too. You now have two solid choices: teach a new replacement skill one-on-one, or add a quick group mediation essay after lunch.

04

Why it matters

You can copy this tomorrow. Post three lunch rules. If a student breaks one, hand them a half-sheet that asks: 'What rule did I break? Who did it hurt? What will I do next time?' Collect it on the way out. No tokens, no money, no extra staff. The 1974 data say you should see a fast, big drop in noise and wandering. Try it for two weeks and track rule violations. If it works, you just saved your recess duty voice.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Post three clear lunch rules and keep a stack of half-page mediation sheets; hand one to any rule-breaker before they leave the cafeteria.

02At a glance

Intervention
group contingencies
Design
alternating treatments
Population
neurotypical
Finding
strongly positive
Magnitude
very large

03Original abstract

THREE METHODS OF CONTROLLING DISRUPTIVE LUNCHROOM BEHAVIORS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN WERE COMPARED: basic modification procedures, basic modification procedures plus punishment essays, and basic modification procedures plus mediation essays. During an in-service workshop, six paraprofessional lunch aides received training in these methods to modify three classes of disruptive lunchroom behaviors. They then applied the methods in a counter-balanced design. Fourth- and fifth-grade elementary school pupils were observers and made reliability counts of the target misbehaviors under the various methods. Results indicated that during the periods when aides had been directed to use basic modification procedures plus mediation essays, target misbehaviors were almost totally eliminated and occurred significantly less often than during the periods when they had been directed to use basic modification procedures alone or basic modification procedures plus punishment essays.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1974 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1974.7-287