Autism & Developmental

Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.

Dyer et al. (1990) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1990
★ The Verdict

Letting students pick tasks and rewards lowers severe problem behavior while keeping work on track.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running classrooms or home programs for learners with autism or ID who show aggression or self-injury.
✗ Skip if Clinicians already using full function-based choice plus replacement skill packages.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Three students with severe disabilities took part. Each child could pick the next task and the reward they wanted.

The researchers flipped back and forth. Some days the teacher chose. Other days the student chose. They watched how often serious problem behavior happened.

02

What they found

When students picked, aggression and self-injury dropped. Correct work stayed the same. Choice cut problem behavior without hurting learning.

03

How this fits with other research

Willemsen-Swinkels et al. (1998) later showed one boy picked a choice condition even when it gave him 40 times fewer rewards. Choice itself acted like candy.

Lovitt et al. (1969) had already seen that kids work harder when they set their own goals. Morris et al. (1990) moved the idea from academics to severe behavior.

McKenna et al. (2017) built on this by adding a functional twist. They first found why the behavior happened, then taught a new response. Choice is a quick antecedent fix; function-based teaching is a deeper one.

04

Why it matters

You can start using choice today. Offer two tasks and two reinforcers before work begins. It takes seconds and can stop hitting or screaming before it starts. No extra training, no fancy forms—just ask, "Do you want to match or sort?" and "Tablet or bubbles after?" Then watch the room calm down.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Before the next session, give the learner two picture cards: one for the task and one for the reinforcer—count problem behavior for ten minutes and compare to last no-choice day.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
reversal abab
Sample size
3
Population
autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

This study assessed the impact of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of 3 students with severe autism and/or mental retardation. In the context of within-subject reversal designs, the results showed consistently reduced levels of problem behaviors (e.g., aggression) when the students were given opportunities to make choices among instructional tasks and reinforcers. Additional data showed no systematic differences in the rate of correct responding between the two conditions. The results are discussed in relation to the continuing search for effective, nonintrusive solutions to the occurrence of serious problem behavior.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1990 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-515