"We want respect": adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities address respect in research.
Respect is the first intervention in any research plan with adults who have IDD.
01Research in Context
What this study did
McDonald (2012) asked adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities what respectful research feels like.
The adults spoke in focus groups and interviews. They shared stories of times they felt heard and times they felt used.
What they found
Participants said respect means being treated as partners, not lab subjects.
They wanted clear words, real choices, and researchers who care about their lives after the study ends.
How this fits with other research
van Timmeren et al. (2016) later tested a tool that puts this respect into action. Their Nominal Group Technique let adults with IDD co-design health materials.
Richman (2008) showed another path: Photovoice lets adults take photos of their day and explain what matters to them.
Together these papers form a toolkit. McDonald (2012) sets the ethic: treat us as equals. The later studies give step-by-step ways to do it.
Why it matters
Before you write a consent form or start a survey, run it through the respect check. Would the adults in Elizabeth’s study feel like partners when they see it? If not, rewrite, add pictures, or hold a small Nominal Group session first. Respect is the first intervention.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add one respect step to your next data session: ask the adult to choose the snack, the chair, or the order of questions.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Respect is central to ethical guidelines for research. The scientific community has long debated, and at times disagreed on, how to demonstrate respect in research with adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. To illuminate the voices of those most affected, the author studies the views of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities on respect in research. Findings are consistent with disability rights' ideas and indicate that adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities have much to contribute to the discussion, that they value participating, and that they agree with calls to focus on human rights and dignity. Notably, participants spoke at lengths about the nature of interactions between researchers and participants. Implications are discussed, including how to infuse research standards with community-supported values and preferences.
American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2012 · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263