Science Should Push Us Forward, Not Back, to a "New Normal".
COVID proved IDD services are fragile; this editorial demands we rebuild them stronger, not return to the old status quo.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Symons (2022) wrote a short editorial. It uses the COVID-19 crisis as a mirror. The mirror shows where intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) science is weak.
The paper does not test people or run trials. It argues. It says, "Do not slide back to 2019. Build a better normal."
What they found
The editorial finds that the pandemic pulled back the curtain. Services stopped. Research froze. Families were left alone.
The author says these gaps were already there. COVID just made them visible. The field must now choose: repeat the past or redesign the future.
How this fits with other research
Moya et al. (2022) extend the same cry. They count real deaths and closed day programs. Their numbers give bones to J’s warning.
Shpigelman et al. (2024) show one fix. They asked families of adults in group homes what saved the day. Answer: daily calls and flexible visits. Their data is a living example of the "new normal" J wants.
Coe et al. (1997) said the same thing after an earthquake. People with ID were stranded then too. The message is old; the refusal to listen is older. Symons (2022) simply says the cycle must break now.
Why it matters
You write plans, train staff, and track goals. This editorial says add one more task: push your agency to keep the crisis lessons alive. Build backup contact trees. Invite families to co-write emergency rules. Share your data in the open so the next crisis hits softer. Small acts, done by many BCBAs, become the new normal the paper demands.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a family-backup contact sheet to every client’s file and test it with a five-minute call this week.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
In a recent Science editorial, Christina Pagel (2022) made the point with her title that "'Back to Normal' Is Not Enough." She was, of course, writing on the COVID-19 pandemic and reflecting on the past 2 years. As I write this, it is 2 years to the day since I left my "normal" work office. I still recall the conversation among several colleagues as we exited the building—that we would see each other in a couple of weeks. The weeks turned to months and the months to years. Among many of Dr. Pagel's points, she noted that evolution has positioned humans to perceive threat in time scales on the order of hours and days, not necessarily in years and decades. She was writing from the point of view of urgent looming threats specific to climate change problems and our collective response to them including complacency and sentiments in some sectors that the problems are not solvable.In this issue, through an invited commentary, Amy Hewitt, John Smith, and Liz Weintraub provide an important voice about threats of a different kind by making the point that "back to normal" for research, policy, and practice in intellectual and developmental disabilities will not be enough. Our approaches—scientific and societal—in supporting and improving the lives of individuals living with intellectual disability and associated conditions need not go back to a normal that was incomplete. From a scientific perspective, certainly there are incomplete technical problems faced by any given research agenda in intellectual disability, particularly those on frontiers (e.g., clinical genomics, implementation science, causal mechanisms) as it relates to measurement, representative recruitment and sampling, etc., but there also collective action problems—the latter often being the more difficult of the two as they require political will related to mobilizing individuals into working groups making the connections among the scientific community and the larger societal practice and policy communities.The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed problems that we—our field—may have implicitly regarded as intractable or just part of the system, part of our normal. Pay close attention to the language and the message of the Invited Commentary. My goal in inviting it was to energize and reinvigorate an imperative that the AAIDD/AJIDD research community use the strength of science to solve the challenges faced by individuals and their families living with intellectual disability; to be inclusive in our research practices; to ask the hard questions and push ourselves to be part of a collective action to answer them—the challenges are not new but COVID-19 reminds us they continue and need to be addressed with intentionality, urgency, and intellectual humility such that a "new normal" should not look like the "old."
American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2022 · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-127.4.269