Practitioner Development

Editorial.

Iwata (1984) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1984
★ The Verdict

JABA’s 1984 birthday editorial kicked off a 40-year conversation about using editorial kindness to grow the science.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write, review, or mentor others.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for direct client interventions.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

This 1984 editorial looks back at the first 17 years of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

The editor describes how the journal grew and thanks authors, reviewers, and readers.

No new data are given; the piece is a short mission check-in.

02

What they found

The editor reports steady growth in submissions and praise for the journal’s practical focus.

The tone is upbeat: the field is moving and the journal is keeping pace.

03

How this fits with other research

Iwata (1993) updates the same theme nine years later. That editorial says the review process itself trains writers, turning every manuscript cycle into free CE.

Gold (1993) extends the idea further. It urges applied readers to mine basic JEAB studies for usable tactics, bridging the two journals.

Cengher et al. (2024) brings the thread into today. Their primer teaches reviewers how to give kind, rigorous feedback, showing the culture first praised in 1984 is now teachable content.

Together these four pieces trace a 40-year arc: from celebration of growth, to viewing review as education, to explicit reviewer training.

04

Why it matters

The chain shows JABA’s culture was never an accident—it was built by intentional, friendly review. When you write or review today, you keep that custom alive. Model the same clear, helpful tone and the field keeps growing.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Write your next review with one warm comment and one concrete fix—keep the 1984 spirit alive.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

their terms of office with editorials in which they reviewed the progress made by this Journal and the field that it represents, elaborated on the Journal's mission and editorial practice, and suggested several promising areas

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1984 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-1