Practitioner Development

Collecting the first dollars for JEAB.

Lindsley (1987) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1987
★ The Verdict

A 1987 editorial reminds us that supportive reviews grow science faster than harsh ones.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who review for journals or train new reviewers.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only read final articles and never review.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Coleman (1987) wrote a short editorial. It praised the kind tone of JEAB reviews.

No data were collected. The piece simply celebrated the journal’s friendly culture.

02

What they found

The author found that supportive reviews helped new authors stay in the field.

Kind words, not harsh ones, kept the pipeline of experiments flowing.

03

How this fits with other research

Laties (2008) looked back 50 years and showed JEAB grew more diverse and open. The friendly culture R praised helped attract that wider pool.

Cengher et al. (2024) later wrote a how-to guide for reviewers. Their four pillars—responsibility, kindness, rigor—turn R’s 1987 spirit into concrete steps.

Hineline (1987), printed the same year, thanked outgoing staff. Together the two editorials show that both people and tone matter for a healthy journal.

04

Why it matters

When you review a paper, copy JEAB’s style. Start with what the authors did right. Then give one clear next step. This small habit keeps good scientists writing and our field growing.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Write your next review with one genuine strength first, then one fixable weakness.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
theoretical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

control is not exactly the same as understanding how things work, which was my passion.The beauty of a set of numbers, or a cumulative record, may depend on such passions of the beholder, which perhaps accounts in part for the somewhat varied reactions to the JEAB viewpoint over the years.A uniqueness that all can applaud, I think, is JEAB's 30-year status as a paragon of journal management.Most notable has been the Journal's steadfast concern for authors.Over the many years during which Pat Blough or I have served on the editorial board, we have rarely seen a review or an editorial letter that did not instruct and encourage.Charlie Fers- ter's sensitivity to the plight of unrequited au- thors lives on.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1987 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1987.48-469