Autism & Developmental

Teaching Individuals to Signal for Assistance in a Timely Manner.

Saunders et al. (2012) · Behavioral interventions : theory & practice in residential & community-based clinical programs 2012
★ The Verdict

An adaptive switch that says "help me" can teach help-requesting to non-verbal adults, yet half may still need extra exemplars.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working with non-verbal adults in day or residential programs
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving only verbal children or mild disabilities

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with eight adults who could not speak and had severe intellectual disabilities. Each person got an adaptive switch that spoke the words "help me" when pressed.

Staff taught switch use first, then set up short tasks that were just hard enough to need help. If the adult hit the switch, staff jumped in right away. No press meant no help.

02

What they found

Every adult learned to hit the switch, but only half used it to ask for help. The other four kept trying the task alone or showed frustration without pressing.

The authors say extra practice with many different hard tasks might be needed for the second group.

03

How this fits with other research

Pierce et al. (1994) got grade-school students with delays to ask for help using a simple picture card. All of them succeeded. The adults in the new study had far more impairments, so the tech fix alone was not enough.

Carnett et al. (2020) taught preschoolers with autism to ask "where" questions on an SGD. Like the current study, every child learned the device, yet generalizing the question to new items needed extra teaching. Together the papers show: SGD training works, but plan for more exemplars.

Rojahn et al. (1994) boosted help requests in special-ed classrooms by delaying help until students asked. The 2012 study keeps the same logic but swaps the teacher cue for an electronic switch, proving the rule holds even when the learner cannot speak.

04

Why it matters

If you serve adults who are non-verbal and have severe ID, an adaptive switch plus SGD is worth trying, but expect splits in outcome. Build a long list of tricky tasks and probe early to see who needs more exemplars. Document each learner’s progress so you can add prompting or generalization steps before frustration sets in.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Program one big switch to say "help me," pick a short hard task, and prompt the hit; keep data on independent requests across three new tasks this week.

02At a glance

Intervention
functional communication training
Design
single case other
Sample size
8
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
small

03Original abstract

The study describes the adaptive-switch performances of 8 adults with severe multiple impairments. Each was given a series of progressively more difficult discrimination tasks that, if solved, would require the participant to close the switch to activate a device that was not operating or to stay away from the switch if the device was operating. Then in a 2-choice format, a preference test was conducted by providing 2 devices simultaneously that could be activated or deactivated by closure or release of the switch. Finally, a preferred device was activated and then surreptitiously deactivated. Switch closures in this contingency activated a speech-generating device that played the message, "Help me." All 8 participants learned to control devices using their adaptive switch, but only 4 participants learned to make a request for help. Reasons for the different performances across learners and nonlearners are discussed.

Behavioral interventions : theory & practice in residential & community-based clinical programs, 2012 · doi:10.1002/bin.1346