Autism & Developmental

Increased parent reinforcement of spontaneous requests in children with autism spectrum disorder: effects on problem behavior.

Robertson et al. (2013) · Research in developmental disabilities 2013
★ The Verdict

Reinforcing your child's spontaneous requests at home can replace problem behavior maintained by the same reinforcer.

✓ Read this if BCBAs training parents of young children with autism who tantrum for tangible items.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working in center-only programs with no parent contact.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Robertson et al. (2013) worked with families of children with autism at home. Parents were taught to give the same reinforcer for both spontaneous requests and for problem behavior.

The team used an ABAB reversal design. When problem behavior earned the toy, parents later gave the toy only for requests. They measured which response the child used more.

02

What they found

Children quickly chose to ask instead of act out. Problem behavior dropped when requests paid off.

The effect reversed each time the condition changed. Reinforcement, not just teaching, drove the shift.

03

How this fits with other research

Pierce et al. (1994) showed the same idea at school. Teachers prompted students with disabilities to ask for help; disruptive behavior fell. The mechanism matches, but E et al. moved it to the living room with parents in charge.

Charlop et al. (1985) first taught autistic kids to speak up using time-delay prompts. E et al. kept the spontaneous request goal but swapped prompts for pure parent reinforcement, proving the response still grows without adult cues.

Carnett et al. (2020) extends the logic to speech-generating devices. Their children learned to ask 'where' questions on an iPad. Both papers confirm FCT works across vocal words or electronic voice, so pick the modality the child already has.

DeLeon et al. (2003) started with a functional analysis, then taught wheelchair-movement requests to replace aggression. E et al. skipped the formal FA but still matched the reinforcer; together they show you can either assess first or simply observe what the child wants and then pay the same item for a request.

04

Why it matters

You can run this tonight. Watch what the child is willing to tantrum for—cookie, iPad, tickles. Tell parents to give that same item the instant the child asks, even if the ask is just a word, sign, or picture. Do not wait for perfect speech. The study says the behavior will swap because the same payoff now travels the easier route. Coach parents to stay neutral when problem behavior still happens—no cookie, no eye-roll—then deliver immediately when the request appears. In one weekend you may see the first dip in problem behavior and a nice bump in spontaneous communication.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one tangible the child usually screams for; tell parents to give it only when the child uses any acceptable request form today.

02At a glance

Intervention
functional communication training
Design
reversal abab
Sample size
2
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Previous studies of response classes in individuals with developmental disabilities (DD) and problem behavior have shown that mild problem behavior, precursor behavior, and mands or requests can occur as functionally equivalent to severe problem behavior in some individuals. Furthermore, participants in some studies chose to use functionally equivalent alternatives over severe problem behavior to produce the maintaining reinforcer. The present study added to this literature by having parents reinforce spontaneous requests functionally equivalent to problem behavior in their children with autism at home. First, parent-implemented functional analyses identified conditions associated with increased problem behavior and requests in two children with autism. Then, parents provided the maintaining reinforcer contingent on problem behavior alone or both problem behavior and requests in a withdrawal design. The treatment analysis indicated that the same reinforcer maintained child requests and problem behavior. In addition, when parents reinforced both requests and problem behavior, child participants demonstrated a preference for requests, thereby decreasing problem behavior. Implications of this relation for function-based treatment of problem behavior in children with autism are discussed.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.011