Reward circuitry function in autism during face anticipation and outcomes.
In ASD, the brain's threat center overreacts to faces while the reward center underreacts to money, explaining why social praise often backfires.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers scanned the brains of the kids with ASD and 15 typical kids. They watched how each child's reward circuits lit up when waiting for money or a smiling face. The team used fMRI to track brain activity during both anticipation and the actual reward.
Each child played a simple guessing game inside the scanner. Correct guesses earned either a dollar or a picture of a happy face. Scientists measured activation in key reward areas like the ventral striatum and amygdala.
What they found
Kids with ASD showed weaker brain response to money rewards. Their ventral striatum barely lit up compared to typical kids. But when waiting for faces, their amygdala and insula went into overdrive.
The stronger the amygdala response to faces, the worse the child's social symptoms. Money rewards didn't link to symptom severity at all. This split pattern suggests social and non-social rewards operate differently in ASD.
How this fits with other research
Eussen et al. (2016) extends these findings by showing the ASD amygdala also habituates more slowly to fearful faces. While S et al. found heightened initial response to happy faces, M et al. tracked how that response lingers longer for scary ones. Together they paint a picture of an amygdala that's both overactive and sticky when processing any facial emotion.
van Noordt et al. (2017) adds another layer using EEG instead of fMRI. They found weaker frontal theta rhythms during reward feedback in ASD. This suggests the reward processing problems go beyond the amygdala to include frontal coordination circuits.
Kaartinen et al. (2016) seems to contradict the heightened arousal finding, showing kids with ASD actually habituate less to eye contact. But the difference is measurement: fMRI shows brain activation spikes while skin conductance shows slower autonomic calming. Both can be true - the brain overfires initially while the body takes longer to settle down.
Why it matters
This tells us why social rewards often fail in ASD interventions. The child's brain treats faces as threats rather than rewards. Try leading with non-social reinforcers first - stickers, tokens, or screen time. When you do use social praise, pair it with established reinforcers until the amygdala learns faces predict good things. Track which types of social cues trigger avoidance - direct eye contact might be overwhelming while shoulder gaze feels safer. Build up tolerance gradually rather than flooding with social rewards that currently register as danger.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Replace verbal praise with tangible reinforcers during new skill acquisition, then fade in social rewards once the skill is established
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate reward circuitry responses in autism during reward anticipation and outcomes for monetary and social rewards. During monetary anticipation, participants with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) showed hypoactivation in right nucleus accumbens and hyperactivation in right hippocampus, whereas during monetary outcomes, participants with ASDs showed hyperactivation in left midfrontal and anterior cingulate gyrus. Groups did not differ in nucleus accumbens responses to faces. The ASD group demonstrated hyperactivation in bilateral amygdala during face anticipation that predicted social symptom severity and in bilateral insular cortex during face outcomes. These results add to the growing body of evidence that autism is characterized by altered functioning of reward circuitry. Additionally, atypical amygdala activation during the processing of social rewards may contribute to the development or expression of autistic features.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2012 · doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1221-1