RECALL prompting hierarchy improves responsiveness for autistic children and children with language delay: a single-case design study.
Least-to-most prompting with visual cue cards during dialogic reading quickly lifts correct answers in minimally verbal preschoolers with autism or language delays.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Bosley et al. (2024) tested a new way to prompt kids during story time. They worked with six preschoolers who had autism or language delays. Most kids spoke fewer than 20 words.
The team used RECALL dialogic reading. They added a least-to-most prompting hierarchy and small picture cards. Adults asked questions, then gave help step by step until the child answered.
The study ran a multiple baseline across kids. Sessions happened at home or in preschool rooms.
What they found
All six kids gave more correct answers during reading. Responses jumped from about a large share to a large share by the end.
Kids also started talking more to the adult. Gains stayed high when the cards were removed. Broader social starts, like waving or saying hello, did not change much.
How this fits with other research
The results line up with Griffith et al. (2012). That team used an interrupted chain to teach mands. Both studies show that careful prompting plus fading builds new words in minimally verbal kids.
Cariveau et al. (2023) compared simultaneous prompting to a delay cue for a preschooler with Down syndrome. They found faster learning with the prompt delivered right away. Bosley’s team chose least-to-most instead, but both papers agree: clear prompt hierarchies speed skill gain.
Bishop et al. (2020) paired echoic prompts with a speech-generating device. They also saw more vocal output. The new study swaps the device for picture cards during shared reading, giving teachers a low-tech option.
Why it matters
If you run story groups, try adding small picture cue cards and a least-to-most prompt ladder. Ask a question, wait, then point to the card, then give a one-word model. In Bosley’s study this simple shift turned quiet preschoolers into active book talkers within weeks.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Tape small picture cues of key story items inside the book. Ask a question, wait three seconds, then point to the cue and model the answer.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The purpose of the current study was to expand upon previous research on RECALL, a dialogic reading intervention modified for autistic children aimed at increasing engagement. Children ages 3–6 years (n = 6) with language delays with or without co-occurring autism were tested using a multiple baseline across participants design. During baseline, the interventionist used dialogic reading and asked questions after every page. During intervention, the interventionist used RECALL, including a least to most prompting hierarchy with visual prompt cards. Children were more responsive and produced more meaningful correct responses during the intervention. Response type (linguistic vs. non-linguistic) also changed from baseline to intervention, though the pattern varied across participants. Intervention was not associated with increased responsiveness to adult bids for attention or pauses designed to encourage the child to initiate an interaction, though a few children showed changes in these responses over time.
Frontiers in Psychology, 2024 · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1435688