Autism & Developmental

Judging the Intensity of Emotional Expression in Faces: the Effects of Colored Tints on Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Whitaker et al. (2016) · Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research 2016
★ The Verdict

Giving kids with autism a self-chosen colored sheet over emotion faces instantly improved their intensity judgments in lab tests.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching facial emotion skills to autistic learners in clinic or school.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working on non-face goals or with adults who have normal color vision preferences.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Whitaker et al. (2016) asked kids with autism to judge how strong an emotion looked on real faces shown on a computer screen. Each child first picked a favorite colored plastic sheet to lay over the screen. Then they rated happy, sad, angry, and fearful faces with and without their chosen tint.

Typical peers did the same task for comparison. The study ran in a quiet lab room with standardized photos so only the tint changed.

02

What they found

Children with autism scored higher on emotion-intensity ratings when their own colored overlay was in place. Without the tint their accuracy dropped. Matched controls showed no gain from any color, proving the benefit was autism-specific.

The tint did not change response speed—only accuracy improved. A simple sheet of color acted like a visual helper for reading facial feelings.

03

How this fits with other research

Järvinen-Pasley et al. (2008) saw autistic kids struggle with basic color memory and search tasks. That earlier deficit makes the new win surprising—poor color skills yet a color aid helps. The difference is choice: the 2016 children picked the shade that felt comfortable, turning a weakness into a support.

Hamama et al. (2021) later showed emotion-congruent background music also boosts face-emotion scores in autism. Music and tint are different senses, but both give the brain extra structure. Together they suggest any matched sensory cue can scaffold emotion recognition.

Wright et al. (2008) found high-functioning youth with autism only slipped on anger/happy faces, while Sahuquillo-Leal et al. (2025) report more gaze errors toward angry faces. Lydia’s tint did not target anger specifically, yet it lifted intensity judgments across emotions, offering a low-tech patch for a hard skill.

04

Why it matters

You can borrow the tint trick tomorrow. Let your learner select a colored overlay for tablets, worksheets, or Zoom faces during emotion drills. No extra training, no cost, and the lab says accuracy rises right away. Pair it with mood-matching songs from Hamama et al. (2021) for a cheap two-sense boost.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Offer three transparent colored folders and let the learner pick one to lay over tablet emotion cards during your next feelings lesson.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often show atypical processing of facial expressions, which may result from visual stress. In the current study, children with ASD and matched controls judged which member of a pair of faces displayed the more intense emotion. Both faces showed anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness or surprise but to different degrees. Faces were presented on a monitor that was tinted either gray or with a color previously selected by the participant individually as improving the clarity of text. Judgments of emotional intensity improved significantly with the addition of the preferred colored tint in the ASD group but not in controls, a result consistent with a link between visual stress and impairments in processing facial expressions in individuals with ASD.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2016 · doi:10.1002/aur.1506