Initial characteristics of psychological development and evolution of the young autistic child.
One in four autistic kids shows almost no developmental gain between ages 5 and 8, so early skill level should drive goal setting, not age.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Pry et al. (2007) watched autistic children grow. They tracked kids from age 5 to 8. The team looked at language, play, and social skills every year.
No therapy was tested. The goal was to see how different kids change over time.
What they found
Four clear paths showed up. About one in five kids shot ahead. Another quarter made small gains. Roughly one third stayed flat. One in four barely moved.
The paths stayed the same for each child. Early scores predicted later scores.
How this fits with other research
Solomon et al. (2018) found the same four paths when they tracked IQ instead of global skills. Their study started at age 2, not 5, and still saw the same spread.
Dellapiazza et al. (2024) followed 575 kids and also split them fifty-fifty: half changed, half stayed put. The bigger sample backs up the 2007 picture.
Brignell et al. (2024) looked only at language. They learned that starting language level, not the autism label, shaped later growth. This extends René’s message: initial skill matters more than diagnosis.
Why it matters
Do not assume a child will “catch up” just because they are young. Check each client’s starting profile and set realistic goals. Re-test every six months. If a child sits in the no-gain group after two cycles, shift to more intense, targeted goals instead of waiting for natural growth.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Open the last two progress reports. If gains are flat, add one new intensive program (e.g., 10 extra weekly trials of the weakest domain) instead of waiting another quarter.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This longitudinal study assessed multidisciplinary data on 219 children with autistic spectrum disorders from the median age of 5 (Time 1) to 8 years old (Time 2). The evolution of psychological and adaptive data was subjected to cluster analysis. Four clinically meaningful clusters emerged. The first group (21%) demonstrated the most important psychological transformations between the two times of the research. The second group (24%) made progress but less than group 1. The third and biggest group (30%) kept the same developmental slope. The fourth group (25%) showed no significant evolution between the two times of the research. This study highlights important differences among children with autism and the necessity of using a developmental view when considering the autistic syndrome.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2007 · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0161-7