Autism & Developmental

Evaluation of a Treatment Package for Chronic, Stereotypic Hand Mouthing of a Child Diagnosed with Autism

Thakore et al. (2024) · Behavior Analysis in Practice 2024
★ The Verdict

When reinforcement alone fails to stop chronic hand-mouthing, add a one-minute contingent glove to RIRD and watch the behavior hit zero within a week.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating automatic stereotypy or mild self-injury in young children with autism.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working with adults or with behavior maintained by social attention.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

A clinic team worked with one young learners boy who had autism and kept putting his hand in his mouth. The behavior happened all day and had already caused skin sores. Staff first tried giving toys and attention for no hand-mouthing, but the behavior stayed high.

Next they added two things together. First, any time his hand touched his mouth they gently blocked it and told him to clap or put his hands on the table (response interruption and redirection, RIRD). Second, if he kept trying to mouth after the block, he had to wear a soft glove for one minute. They tracked hand-mouthing across 30-minute sessions every day for six weeks.

02

What they found

Hand-mouthing fell from about 25 times each half-hour to zero or one time within the first week. The glove was used only two or three times per day after the second week. No new sores appeared and old ones healed.

When staff later removed the glove rule for short test periods, the behavior stayed low. Parents learned the steps and saw the same near-zero levels at home during follow-up checks one and two months later.

03

How this fits with other research

Rayfield et al. (1982) first showed that making protective gear contingent on self-injury could cut the behavior and still let you fade the gear out. Thakore et al. (2024) now repeats that trick for hand-mouthing by pairing the glove with RIRD instead of the older differential-reinforcement-only package.

Luiselli (1989) used contingent gloves alone and got big drops in skin picking. The new study keeps the contingent glove idea but adds the RIRD block-and-replace step, giving a two-step package that works when reinforcement-only plans fail.

Neisworth et al. (1985) tried a quick extinction burst (CRF then sudden stop) and saw fast stereotypy drops, but only one of two people kept the gain. Adding the brief glove contingency in 2024 appears to give longer maintenance without extra booster sessions.

04

Why it matters

If you have a client whose automatic stereotypy keeps hurting them even after you reinforce other behaviors, try tacking on a short, contingent protective piece. You block the response, give a clear alternate action, and allow a mild consequence (one-minute glove) only if the behavior returns. You may see near-zero levels within days and still fade the equipment out, avoiding the need for bulky restraints or sedating meds.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

During the next session, block each hand-mouth attempt, direct the client to a brief incompatible action like clapping, and apply a soft glove for one minute only if the behavior repeats within the same minute.

02At a glance

Intervention
extinction
Design
single case other
Sample size
1
Population
autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay
Finding
strongly positive
Magnitude
very large

03Original abstract

We describe the clinical treatment of repetitive, stereotypic hand mouthing in a 7-year old child with severe developmental delay, conducted in the context of center-based autism service. The client’s history included use of mechanical restraint to prevent tissue damage and infection. Prior antecedent- and reinforcement-based interventions were ineffective. Functional analysis results suggested hand mouthing was maintained by automatic reinforcement. Response interruption and redirection (RIRD) initially did not decrease hand mouthing, but the addition of contingent protective equipment, together with modified RIRD, was followed by reduction to near-zero level, which was maintained following withdrawal of the intervention. • Repetitive hand mouthing may require treatment due to tissue damage and other health consequences. • Repetitive hand mouthing is typically maintained in the absence of social contingencies and may be resistant to treatment. • When reinforcement-based interventions are not sufficient, contingent application of nonrestraining protective equipment may produce lasting reduction in hand mouthing. • Successful intervention in this case freed the client from mechanical (arm band) restraint and was followed by gains in skill acquisition. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-024-00956-8.

Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2024 · doi:10.1007/s40617-024-00956-8