Depression, anxiety, and relevant cognitions in persons with mental retardation.
Simplified self-report mood scales work for adults with mild-moderate ID, yet depression and anxiety thoughts overlap heavily.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Glenn et al. (2003) asked 46 adults with mild-moderate intellectual disability to fill out shortened, plain-language versions of two common mood scales.
The team wanted to know if these easy-read forms could still show the difference between depression thoughts and anxiety thoughts.
What they found
The adults could answer the forms just fine, and their depression and anxiety scores moved up and down together.
Negative thoughts predicted bad mood, but the same thoughts showed up for both depression and anxiety, so the two feelings were hard to pull apart.
How this fits with other research
Johnson et al. (1994) already showed that people with ID can give steady self-reports on mood; Elizabeth’s team proved the same thing with newer, shorter forms.
Kooijmans et al. (2024) now offers an even better way: they added picture cues and larger fonts and got closer agreement with carers, so the 2003 method has been upgraded.
Heiman (2001) looked at students aged 8-18 and found that school setting, not thoughts, predicted mood; the adult focus on overlapping depression-anxiety thoughts does not clash—it just shows that age and place change what matters most.
Why it matters
You can trust brief, simplified mood scales with adults who have mild-moderate ID, but don’t expect clean labels of “depressed” versus “anxious.” Use the total distress score to flag clients who need more help, then dig into daily events and coping thoughts during your interview.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Hand your client the 12-item easy-read mood form, score it, and if total is high, follow up with open questions about sleep, worry, and recent life changes.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We assessed depression, anxiety, and relevant cognitions in persons with mental retardation by administering modified versions of the Reynolds Child Depression Scale, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire, and the Cognitions Checklist to 46 persons with borderline to moderate mental retardation. Consistent with research with other groups, self-reports of depression and anxiety were highly correlated (r = .74) in these individuals, and cognitions were strong predictors of negative affect. Subscales measuring cognitions related to depression and anxiety were also highly related, limiting the "cognitive-specificity" hypothesis. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses offered mixed support for cognitive-specificity. We discuss the implications of these findings for the cognitive and affective assessment of persons with intellectual limitations.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2003 · doi:10.1023/a:1022282521625