Autism & Developmental

Antecedent manipulation in the treatment of primary solid food refusal.

Johnson et al. (1993) · Behavior modification 1993
★ The Verdict

When physical prompts are off the table, fade the spoon and food texture in baby steps while reinforcing acceptance to turn bottle feeding into spoon feeding.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating feeding refusal in kids with medical fragility or oral-motor limits.
✗ Skip if Clinicians whose clients already accept spoon bites and need texture expansion only.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with one preschooler who had many disabilities. The child would only swallow from a bottle and refused spoon food.

They could not use physical prompts because the child had medical risks. Instead they changed what the spoon looked like and how smooth the food was.

Each step moved the child closer to normal eating. They also gave a favorite toy when the child accepted the bite.

02

What they found

By the end, the child took 94 percent of spoon bites. Problem behaviors like crying and turning away dropped to almost zero.

The gains stayed high when staff and parents ran the plan. Meals became faster and calmer for everyone.

03

How this fits with other research

Kozlowski et al. (2024) later repeated the same idea with two kids with autism. They also faded from finger feeding to spoon and saw big jumps in acceptance.

Laugeson et al. (2014) stretched the idea further. When a child clamped his teeth, they started liquids with a syringe and then faded to spoon. All three studies show you can enter at different points and still reach the same goal.

Luiselli (2000) added picture cards that told the child how many bites were left. That study moved past acceptance and taught the child to feed himself. Together the papers form a ladder: first get the bite, then get the spoon, then get independence.

04

Why it matters

If you work with kids who can’t be touched for medical reasons, fading utensil type and food texture gives you a safe first step. Start where the child already eats, even if that is a bottle or syringe. Reinforce each new step and move slowly. You can run this plan in clinics, homes, or schools without extra gear.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Offer the first bite with the utensil the child already tolerates, then swap 25 percent of the surface to a regular spoon and deliver a preferred item right after acceptance.

02At a glance

Intervention
feeding intervention
Design
single case other
Sample size
1
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

A 4-year-old with primary solid food refusal was treated with systematic fading of utensil type and food texture, using a multiple probe design across food groups. The subject was a multi-handicapped boy hospitalized for feeding problems, self-injurious behaviors, and sleep cycle reversal. At admission, the subject received all nutrition in the form of a liquid nutritional supplement through regular bottle feedings every half hour. Craniofacial anomalies and past multiple facial surgeries precluded the use of a physical prompting procedure. During the first treatment phase, pureed foods were presented with a preexisting stimulus (a regular baby bottle). Accepted presentations were reinforced with music delivered through headphones. All other behaviors received neutral consequences. In the second treatment phase, undiluted pureed foods were presented in bottles, which allowed experimenter control of the size of the bolus entering the mouth. Consequences were identical to those in Treatment 1. Next, spoon-feedings were introduced with the same consequences in place. Reinforcement with a newly acquired preferred food was initiated and faded to a variable ratio three (VR3) schedule. This fading procedure was effective in teaching this young multihandicapped child to consume a nutritionally balanced diet of pureed foods with an average acceptance of 94% and a concomitant decrease in inappropriate mealtime behaviors.

Behavior modification, 1993 · doi:10.1177/01454455930174006