A comparison of obstetric and neonatal complications between children with autistic disorder and their siblings.
Birth complications do not separate autistic children from their own siblings, so spend assessment time on behavior, not labor records.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers pulled obstetric and newborn hospital records for kids with autism and their brothers or sisters. They scored each record for problems like low birth weight, emergency delivery, or time in intensive care. Then they asked: do autistic children have more of these troubles than their own siblings?
What they found
Overall, the two groups looked almost the same. Most birth events and complications did not differ between autistic children and their siblings. Only a small subset of kids with very severe autism showed a link between higher complication scores and greater symptom severity.
How this fits with other research
The result lines up with Cryan et al. (1996), a direct replication that also found no rise in obstetric adversity when autistic kids were compared to matched controls. It updates the 1980 view from Handleman et al. (1980), which had reported more pregnancy problems in autism; the newer sibling design controls for family background better and washes out that signal.
Later work extends the question. Atladóttir et al. (2015) looked at a wider list of newborn illnesses and saw higher rates in babies later diagnosed with ASD, but the increase was shared with other developmental disorders, not unique to autism. Perales-Marín et al. (2021) went further, showing that different ASD subgroups—defined by added conditions like ADHD or epilepsy—carry their own distinct prenatal risk patterns. Together these papers move the field from 'do birth events cause autism?' to 'which subtypes might be sensitive to which events?'
Why it matters
For BCBAs, this means birth history is rarely useful for deciding whether to assess a child. Focus your intake interview on current behavior, communication, and learning history instead. If you work with a child who has severe autism plus many medical issues, you can expect a slightly rockier health trajectory—plan for extra coordination with nurses or physicians—but routine obstetric data alone should not steer intervention choices.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →During your next intake, skip the birth-story checklist and spend those minutes on a language sample or caregiver interview about daily routines.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Sixty-one children had a diagnosis of autistic disorder according to the DSM3-R criteria in a population based study of mentally retarded children between the ages of 5 and 19 years in the Aberdeen city area of Scotland. Obstetric case records were traced for 36 out of these 61 autistic children. The obstetric case records of siblings of 30 of these autistic children were also traced. Modified versions of Prechtl's obstetric optimality scale along with that of Parnas were used to score pre-, peri- and neonatal obstetric complications in the autistic group and their normal sibling controls. A Spearman's correlation coefficient test between the scores of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and the Obstetric and Neonatal Complication (ONC) scores of all autistic children did not reveal any significant correlation. However, among the 20 severe autistic children, Spearman's test showed significant correlation between the scores of CARS and some ONC scores. Overall, no statistically significant difference between the autistic children and their siblings in the scores of obstetric optimality was detected by using the Wilcoxon test.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1997 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.1997.tb00680.x