Visual behaviour and dyadic interaction between people with intellectual disability and people who are non-disabled.
Non-disabled partners hog eye contact and words—check the tape and share the floor.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team watched the pairs of adults talk for five minutes. One partner had an intellectual disability; the other did not.
Cameras tracked where each person looked and microphones counted words. No one was told what to do.
What they found
Non-disabled partners did almost all the looking and talking. They glanced twice as often and spoke far more.
Disabled partners kept the same eye contact no matter who sat across from them. They did not ramp up or pull back.
How this fits with other research
Chung et al. (2019) later saw the same one-sided pattern in high-school inclusion rooms. Students with IDD talked to peers only once every four minutes.
Brady (2022) sums up many studies like this and says developmental theory can guide better balance. The old 1998 clip is now part of that bigger picture.
Beadle-Brown et al. (2002) warns that social aloofness can stay fixed for years. If we let the imbalance linger, the client may practice silence for a decade.
Why it matters
You may be the one doing all the eye contact and chatting. Tape a short conversation, count who looks and who talks. If you see the 1998 pattern, pause, wait, and give your client five extra seconds to look or speak first. Small edits like this turn a monologue into a true dialogue.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Record a five-minute chat, tally who looks and talks, then add a 5-second wait time before you speak again.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Patterns of visual dominance in human interaction have been studied by a number of authors. The purpose of the present research was to investigate the implications of these studies for interaction between people who are disabled and people who are non-disabled. It was predicted that disability would differentiate the two groups, with non-disabled partners dominating the visual interaction. Two studies are reported. The first looked at visual interaction through the two looking modes of looking while listening and looking while speaking between 16 dyads where one partner was intellectually disabled and the other non-disabled. In the second study, eight subjects who were intellectually disabled and who had participated in the first study interacted with another person who had an intellectual disability. Their looking modes were then compared between conversing with a non-disabled partner in study 1 and with those of their partner with intellectual disability in study 2. The outcome of the studies showed that subjects who were intellectually disabled did not discriminate in looking mode between partners of different intellectual levels. Conversely, subjects who were non-disabled spoke and looked significantly more when conversing with their partner who was intellectually disabled. It has been argued that overlooking and overspeaking could arise from the need for the non-disabled person to gain some sign of affiliation from their partner, or alternatively, that it might reflect a dominant non-disabled person attempting to facilitate a cooperative style.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1998 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00092.x