Autism & Developmental

Difficulties in relationships between nonhandicapped and severely mentally retarded children: the effect of physical impairments.

Cole (1988) · Research in developmental disabilities 1988
★ The Verdict

Kids without disabilities find play less fun when their partner has both severe ID and physical limits—so BCBAs must engineer quick, rewarding interactions.

✓ Read this if BCBAs designing inclusive play groups or social-skills sessions for school-age clients.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who work only with verbal adults or in fully segregated classrooms.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers watched kids play in pairs. One child had no disability. The other had severe intellectual disability plus a physical handicap.

They counted how much the non-disabled child played, talked, and shared toys. They also counted smiles, laughs, and other social reinforcers.

02

What they found

The non-disabled kids played less and gave fewer smiles or laughs when the partner had both ID and physical limits.

The play felt less fun and rewarding for them. Social reinforcers dropped on both sides.

03

How this fits with other research

Chien et al. (2017) saw the same gap 30 years later. Kids with IDD still joined recreation less often and needed more help.

Hamama et al. (2021) found poor motor skills are the main roadblock to physical activity in ID. That backs the 1988 view that physical limits drive peers away.

Bergmann et al. (2019) add a twist. Adults with ID say they want close ties but staff and rules block them. The 1988 data show the barrier can start in childhood play.

Leung et al. (1998) swap play for eye contact. Non-disabled adults looked and talked more, mirroring the childhood “I do most of the work” pattern.

04

Why it matters

If you run social-skills groups, know that physical barriers turn peers off first. Add supports like adapted toys, seating, or simplified motor demands. Pair kids for short, high-reinforcement turns so the non-disabled partner leaves with a smile. Build motor skills too; Hamama et al. (2021) show that pays off in more activity later. Target these fixes early and you shrink the social gap before it hardens.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Start your next group with a 3-minute cooperative game that needs no fine motor skill—like rolling a big ball back-and-forth—and praise both kids each turn.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

Difficulties in relationships between nonhandicapped and severely mentally retarded children (ages 8-12) were examined as a function of the presence or absence of additional physical handicapping conditions. Two sets of data, involving multiple codes of both the handicapped and nonhandicapped children's behavior, were analyzed and aggregated to address this issue. Findings suggested that nonhandicapped children work harder, receive and emit fewer social reinforcers, have less opportunity to play and have fun, and achieve lower levels of social play when their playmate is physically handicapped as well as severely mentally retarded. Implications for the longevity of social relationships with and the community survival of severely multiply handicapped persons are discussed. Strategies for increasing the reinforcement potential of relationships with multiply handicapped children are proposed for future research and implementation.

Research in developmental disabilities, 1988 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(88)90020-0