Assessment & Research

The Role of Stigma in the Autism Diagnostic and Intervention Process: Perspectives of Black Families in the Southeastern US.

Djiko et al. (2025) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2025
★ The Verdict

Stigma keeps Black families in the Southeast from pursuing autism diagnosis and services.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess or intake Black families in any setting.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only serving adult clients with no family contact.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Djiko et al. (2025) asked Black families in the U.S. Southeast how stigma shaped their autism journey.

They used a survey to capture parent stories from first worry to final diagnosis and services.

02

What they found

Families said stigma slowed every step. They felt judged by relatives, teachers, and even doctors.

Because of this judgment many waited years before seeking an evaluation or telling anyone.

03

How this fits with other research

Obeid et al. (2015) saw the same pattern across oceans. College students in Lebanon and the U.S. who knew less about autism also showed more stigma.

Whaling et al. (2025) echo the race angle. Latino families of transition-age youth felt less service knowledge and power than White families, just as Black families feel shut out in Tessa’s study.

Woodman et al. (2025) widen the lens. Their review shows Saudi professionals and the public hold low autism knowledge and high stigma, proving the problem is global, not just American.

04

Why it matters

You can’t speed diagnosis if families fear being labeled. Start every intake by asking, "What have you heard about autism?" Clear up myths right there. Offer parent mentors who share the same culture. When stigma drops, families act sooner and kids get help faster.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one stigma-check question to your intake form: "Have you or your child felt judged because of autism?" Discuss the answer before you talk schedules.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
survey
Sample size
2381
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Autism spectrum disorder in China differs considerably from autism spectrum disorder in the West in terms of prevalence estimates, education opportunities, and life outcomes of autistic people. The lack of autism spectrum disorder awareness could be a key factor underlying the disparities. To date, there has been no evaluation of autism spectrum disorder knowledge among the general public of China. Using the Autism Stigma and Knowledge Questionnaire developed for use in diverse cultural contexts, this study uncovered profoundly different public views about autism spectrum disorder in China compared with the United States. Determined by cognitive diagnosis modeling, 86%-91% of the surveyed U.S. citizens (N = 1127) achieved adequate autism spectrum disorder knowledge in diagnosis/symptoms, etiology, and treatment, whereas for the Chinese citizens (N = 1254) the percentages were only 57%-65%. Moreover, 14% of the participants from the United States were classified to endorse autism spectrum disorder stigma; in comparison, 38% of the Chinese participants endorsed autism spectrum disorder stigma. The Chinese citizens displayed knowledge deficits primarily in the areas of autism spectrum disorder core symptoms, comorbid intellectual impairment, and prognosis. Sociodemographic factors associated with the Chinese citizen's misconceptions included gender, ethnicity, social economic factors, among others. These results have important implications for increasing public awareness and promoting community participation for autistic individuals in China.Lay abstractASD in China differs considerably from ASD in the West in terms of prevalence estimates, education opportunities and life outcomes of autistic people. The lack of ASD awareness could be a key factor underlying these disparities. We asked 1127 U.S. citizens and 1254 Chinese citizens about their autism knowledge using the Autism Stigma and Knowledge Questionnaire (ASK-Q).The results indicated profoundly different public views about ASD in China compared to the U.S. Specifically, only 57%-65% of the Chinese citizens demonstrated adequate ASD knowledge compared to 86%-91% in the U.S. citizens. Fourteen percent of the U.S. citizens were shown to hold stigma beliefs towards ASD; in comparison, 38% of the Chinese citizens indicated ASD stigma. The Chinese citizens displayed misconceptions about ASD related to symptoms, causes, and possible long-term outcomes. In China but not in the U.S., male citizens and citizens with lower social economic status were more likely to have misconceptions about ASD than others were. The findings of this research can help increase public awareness about ASD and create a more inclusive environment for autistic people in China.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025 · doi:10.1177/1362361319900839