Stigma, public awareness about intellectual disability and attitudes to inclusion among different ethnic groups.
Personal contact plus plain-language ID facts lower stigma in every UK ethnic group studied.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Bigham et al. (2013) asked adults across five UK ethnic groups about intellectual disability. They used a short survey on stigma, inclusion, and how much people knew about ID.
The team wanted to see if background, personal contact, or awareness changed attitudes.
What they found
Most people said they support inclusion, but stigma still showed up. Ethnic-minority adults reported higher stigma than White British adults.
People who already knew someone with ID, or who scored higher on ID awareness, held less stigma.
How this fits with other research
The same year, Sheridan et al. (2013) looked at British South-Asian teens. Those teens were even less keen on inclusion than White British teens. The two studies seem to clash, but they don’t: adults in K et al. still favor inclusion, while teens in Joel et al. are more negative. Age and life stage explain the gap.
Klein et al. (2024) later ran the same kind of survey across all of Spain. They found medium stigma and the same protective factors: personal contact and open talk. Their work extends K et al. beyond the UK and shows the pattern holds in another country.
Scior (2011) reviewed 75 earlier papers and warned that most stigma surveys lack strong follow-up. Bigham et al. (2013) is one of those descriptive studies, so it fits the warning: good snapshot, but no test of what actually reduces stigma.
Why it matters
If you run staff training or parent nights, invite people with ID to speak first. Direct contact is the clearest lever we have. Pair that with a quick factsheet that explains what ID is and isn’t. The data say these two moves cut stigma across every ethnic group in the UK sample.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a two-minute ‘meet my neighbor’ video of an adult with ID to your next staff in-service.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Attitudes to the inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) have been studied extensively, yet evidence on public awareness about ID and stigma is limited. The relationship between attitudes, knowledge and stigma associated with ID is poorly understood. The present study examined these factors and the relationships between them in the context of a multicultural society. METHOD: UK residents of working age (n = 1002) were presented with a diagnostically unlabelled vignette of someone with a mild ID. They were asked to label the difficulties presented and to complete measures of social distance and attitudes to the inclusion of people with IDs. RESULTS: While attitudes to the inclusion of people with IDs were relatively positive overall, social contact was viewed with ambivalence. Inclusion attitudes and social distance were only moderately correlated. Across the whole sample 28% recognised typical symptoms of mild ID. Recognition of ID was associated with lower stigma and more positive attitudes than attribution of the difficulties presented to other causes. White Westerners showed increased knowledge, lower stigma and favoured inclusion more than participants from ethnic minorities. Among the latter group, Asians showed lower stigma and attitudes more in line with inclusion policies than participants of Black African/Caribbean backgrounds. Once a host of contextual factors were considered jointly, only contact was consistently associated with the variables measured. CONCLUSIONS: Stigma associated with ID is of concern across all ethnic groups, although it appears to be increased among the public from ethnic minorities. Given that contact and awareness are associated with reduced stigma, they should be considered as prime foci for efforts to tackle ID stigma. The current findings serve as baseline for attempts to increase public awareness and tackle stigma.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2013 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01597.x