Assessment & Research

The Herald of Free Enterprise disaster. Lessons from the first 6 years.

Dalgleish et al. (2000) · Behavior modification 2000
★ The Verdict

Early crisis support and flexible emotion beliefs predict who escapes long-term distress after disaster.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who support clients after crises or work in multidisciplinary disaster-response teams.
✗ Skip if Practitioners serving only stable, non-crisis caseloads with no trauma history.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Byrne et al. (2000) followed survivors of the 1987 Herald of Free Enterprise ferry disaster for six years. They tracked who stayed highly distressed and who recovered.

The team looked at three early warning signs: how much crisis support people got right after the wreck, their beliefs about showing feelings, and how they explained the event to themselves.

02

What they found

Years later, a large minority still carried heavy psychological pain. Three early factors flagged the chronic cases.

Survivors with little early support, negative views of emotional expression, and "I could have stopped it" thinking were most likely to stay stuck in distress.

03

How this fits with other research

Baghdadli et al. (2018) tracked autistic children for fifteen years and also found most stayed on the same rocky path. Both studies show early patterns often lock in long-term.

Erickson et al. (2016) add the inside view: people who can't stand distress tend to bottle it up, ruminate, or avoid—exactly the styles T et al. link to chronic problems.

Adams et al. (2021) watched autistic adults during COVID-19. Again, pre-existing anxiety plus new crisis equaled worsening mental health, echoing the disaster survivor pattern.

04

Why it matters

When you work with clients after a crisis, screen for three red flags: weak support network, shame about showing feelings, and self-blame. Add extra check-ins, teach coping statements, and build support circles in the first weeks. Early action can bend the long-term curve away from chronic distress.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a three-question screen—support level, emotion openness, self-blame—to your intake after any crisis event.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
case series
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

A substantial body of data has been collected on survivors of the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster over the first 6 years. These data show the psychological effects to be considerable, and although they appear to decrease over time, 6 years later there remains a substantial minority that remains highly distressed. Our research has also pointed to those factors that appear to be important in determining the severity and chronicity of symptoms. Levels of crisis support early on seem to be protective. Not everyone has access to supportive others, and these people would seem to be at increased risk of disturbance. But even if crisis support is potentially available from family and friends, not everyone is in a position to draw on these resources. Those individuals who possess negative attitudes toward emotional expression might be less likely to seek out support. Evidence would suggest that modifying such attitudes might be an important component of intervention. A further target for intervention would seem to be the causal attributions made by survivors. It was found that those who perceived the causes of events during the disaster as internal and controllable were at greatest risk of psychological disturbance. The data gathered in the wake of this disaster suggest that intervening early with respect to these three components (crisis support, attitude to emotional expression, and attributional style) is highly likely to mitigate against long-term distress.

Behavior modification, 2000 · doi:10.1177/0145445500245004