The diagnosis of autism by state agencies.
State autism rules still clash across agencies—verify your local criteria before you refer.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The authors mailed a short survey to every U.S. state. They asked two simple questions. What rules does your education department use to label a child autistic? What rules does your mental-health agency use?
All 50 states answered. The team stacked the answers side by side to see how much they matched.
What they found
The rules did not match. Some states wanted a doctor’s note. Others wanted a school team vote. A few listed test scores. Many gave no written steps at all.
In short, a child called autistic in one state might not earn the same label next door.
How this fits with other research
Jones et al. (2010) later showed the fallout: autism labels in special-education tripled in the next decade. When rules are loose, numbers can balloon.
Bao et al. (2017) found the opposite after DSM-5 tightened criteria. Caseloads flattened. Stricter rules slowed new diagnoses.
van Timmeren et al. (2016) updated the map for money, not labels. Only ten states run autism-specific Medicaid waivers today. Provider shortages remain the top hurdle.
Together the papers trace a loop: loose state rules (1988) → label surge (2010) → tighter DSM-5 (2017) → still patchy funding (2016).
Why it matters
Before you refer a child, open your state’s education and Medicaid websites. Print the autism criteria. Check if they match your assessment tool. If they clash, call the district first. A five-minute check can save months of paperwork and prevent a denied service.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Google “(your state) autism eligibility education department,” download the form, and staple it to your intake folder.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A four-question survey form was sent to the Departments of Public Instruction and Departments of Mental Health in all 50 states. The survey solicited information on agency diagnostic practices regarding autism. A 100% return was achieved as an outcome of various follow-up procedures. Considerable variability in diagnostic practice was found between the two agencies and among the states.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1988 · doi:10.1007/BF02211949