The stigma of intellectual disability in Spain: a nationally representative survey.
Spanish adults show medium stigma toward people with ID, but personal contact and open talk quickly lower it.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Klein et al. (2024) asked a random sample of Spanish adults how they view people with intellectual disability. They used a short survey that measured stigma, personal contact, and political views.
The team wanted to know who holds the most stigma and what factors soften it.
What they found
Most adults showed a medium level of stigma. People who already knew someone with ID, talked openly about disability, or leaned progressive scored lower on stigma.
In short, personal connection and open minds protect against stigma.
How this fits with other research
Bigham et al. (2013) ran a similar UK survey eleven years earlier and also found that personal contact and awareness cut stigma across ethnic groups. The Spain data repeat the pattern, showing the effect lasts over time and place.
Walker et al. (2013) went a step further and tested two 10-minute online films. The protest-style film slightly reduced stigma for one month. Their RCT gives you a ready-made tool to try after you see stigma in staff or parents.
Scior (2011) reviewed 75 studies and warned that most stigma surveys are weak on follow-up. Klein et al. (2024) is another descriptive survey, so we still need built-in checks if we run our own stigma-reduction programs.
Why it matters
If you run clinics or school teams in Spain—or any country with low ID visibility—expect medium-level stigma from new staff and parents. Use the quick wins the papers agree on: share short videos of people with ID speaking for themselves, create safe spaces for questions, and pair new hires with mentors who already support clients with ID. These low-cost moves cut stigma before it blocks services.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Show Jessica et al.’s 10-minute protest-style film at staff meeting and track attitudes with a one-page survey.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Stigma towards people with intellectual disability affects various aspects of their lives, including access to employment, housing, health and social care services. Furthermore, this stigma reduces their social opportunities and is even reflected in laws that diminish their autonomy. Due to the practical significance of this issue, the aim of this research is to explore for the first time the social stigma associated with intellectual disability in a representative sample of the Spanish population. METHOD: A cross-sectional quantitative descriptive study was conducted, involving a representative sample of the population (N = 2746). The study includes descriptive analyses and hierarchical regressions to examine various dimensions of stigma, such as attitudes, attributions, and intentions of social distance. RESULTS: Medium levels of stigma are found regarding attitudes and attributions towards people with intellectual disability, while levels are medium-low concerning the intention of social distance. The most reliable indicators of stigma across its various dimensions encompass attitudes, attributions, and the intention of social distance. Factors that contribute to lower stigma include knowing someone with an intellectual disability, being willing to discuss intellectual disability with an acquaintance who has it and having a progressive political ideology. People with intellectual disability show more negative attributions towards themselves. Living with a person with an intellectual disability is another predictor of more stigmatising attitudes, but less intention of social distance. Results are mixed regarding age, gender, and educational level. CONCLUSION: Combating the stigmatisation of people with intellectual disabilities must include comprehensive actions to address attitudes, attributions and behavioural intentions. Public policies, such as national campaigns and programmes, should include contact with and open conversations about intellectual disability, and sensitivity to sociodemographic variables.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2024 · doi:10.1111/jir.13122