Social Validity in Behavioral Research: A Selective Review
Half of recent behavioral studies still skip social-validity checks—so start adding brief consumer surveys today.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Huntington et al. (2023) read every intervention article in JABA and JEAB from 2010-2020.
They counted how many papers asked clients, parents, or teachers if the treatment felt helpful, fair, and doable.
The team also tracked whether social-validity checks grew over time.
What they found
Only 47% of studies reported any social-validity data.
Reporting jumped sharply after 2019, but half the field still skips the step.
When authors did ask, they usually used quick rating scales instead of open questions.
How this fits with other research
Safer-Lichtenstein et al. (2019) found that ASD social-skills trials also hide details—most leave out race, IQ, and gender facts.
Together the two reviews show that behavioral papers often miss the human side: who gets treated and whether they like it.
Vazquez et al. (2019) prove parents will answer acceptability surveys when asked; Huntington’s data say we simply forget to ask.
Laposa et al. (2017) is one of the rare RCTs that did measure social validity; it sits in the minority 47% Huntington highlights.
Why it matters
If you write or read single-case studies, add three Likert questions before you close the file. Ask the client, parent, and teacher: Was the goal important? Was the procedure acceptable? Will you keep using it? It takes five minutes and moves your work into the growing half of the literature that actually checks social validity.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a 3-question social-validity form to your next case-closing packet.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Through the application of behavioral principles, behavior analysts seek to produce socially meaningful behavior change, defined as alterations in behavior that yield important outcomes immediately beneficial for the direct consumers of interventions and key stakeholders. Behavioral practitioners and researchers often engage in assessment and reporting of the meaningfulness of behavior change using social validity assessments. These assessments ensure that target behaviors are appropriately selected, intervention procedures are acceptable, and satisfactory outcomes are produced. The purpose of this review is to identify the current state of social validity within behavioral literature. We reviewed eight peer-reviewed journals between 2010 and 2020. We found that 47% of the intervention studies reviewed included a social validity assessment. Social validity assessment across journals has increased over time, with a significant rise from 2019 to 2020. Implications of these findings and suggestions for future work are discussed.
Perspectives on Behavior Science, 2023 · doi:10.1007/s40614-022-00364-9