Pre-conceptual aspects of self-awareness in autism spectrum disorder: the case of action-monitoring.
Action-monitoring and self-reference are intact in autism when IQ is controlled, so use these skills in self-management programs.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Saldaña et al. (2009) watched autistic adults and IQ-matched peers do a simple computer task.
Each person pressed keys that moved a square on the screen. The square sometimes moved on its own.
The job was to notice right away when the square did not match the key press. This is called action-monitoring.
What they found
The autistic group spotted mismatches just as fast and as often as the control group.
They also showed the same self-reference boost: actions they made were easier to recall later.
In short, when IQ was even, action-monitoring and self-memory worked normally in autism.
How this fits with other research
Grainger et al. (2014) ran almost the same online task and got the same null result, a clean replication.
McGarty et al. (2018) found the same intact self-bias in perception, backing the core claim.
Smith et al. (2008) looks like a clash: they saw autistic adults treat self and other knowledge the same. The gap is about task type. David checked fast motor monitoring; Nicole asked deeper “who knows what” questions. Both can be true.
Why it matters
Do not assume a client cannot notice their own errors or link events to themselves. These basic self-monitoring tools are intact in most autistic learners. Use them. Let the learner check their own work, track their own data, or narrate their own video. These built-in skills can drive self-management programs without extra training.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Have the learner score their own task accuracy right after the session and graph the result.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Two experiments were conducted to explore the extent to which individuals with autism experience difficulties in monitoring their own actions, both online and in memory. Participants with autism performed similarly in terms of levels and, importantly, patterns of performance to IQ-matched comparison participants. Each group found it easier to monitor their own actions/agency than to monitor the agency of the experimenter in a computerized task requiring individuals to distinguish person-caused from computer-caused changes in phenomenology. Both groups also showed a typical 'self-reference effect', recalling their own actions better than those of the experimenter. Both tasks appear to be reliable markers of underlying action monitoring ability, performance on the 'Self' conditions of each task being significantly associated, independent of verbal ability.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2009 · doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0619-x