Assessment & Research

Source monitoring by children with autism.

Farrant et al. (1998) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1998
★ The Verdict

Kids with autism can track their own words just fine, but may still need help catching visible errors.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who run discrete trial or naturalistic sessions that rely on self-correction.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on emotional regulation or peer play.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team asked kids with autism and kids without autism to play a simple word game.

Each child heard some words and said some words aloud. Later they had to pick which words they had said.

This is called reality monitoring: knowing if you did something or just heard about it.

02

What they found

Both groups got the same number of answers right.

Kids with autism were just as good at remembering which words they had said.

No special monitoring deficit showed up on this task.

03

How this fits with other research

Bromley et al. (1998) looked at the same year and the same age group, but used a rocket game. In that task kids with autism missed their own errors far more often.

The clash is only on the surface. One task checks if you know you said a word. The other checks if you fix an error you can see. Different skills, different answers.

Grainger et al. (2014) later tested adults with the same null result, showing the intact skill can last into adulthood.

04

Why it matters

Do not assume a global “self-monitoring problem” in autism. Match your probe to the skill you need. If you want to know whether a learner recalls saying a rule, a simple check like “Did you say it or did I?” should work fine. If you need fast error correction, give clear visual cues and extra practice instead of trusting the learner to notice alone.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

After a learner answers, ask “Who said that, you or me?” to check reality monitoring without extra prompts.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
null

03Original abstract

The term "source monitoring" refers to the ability to distinguish the origins of memories. One type of source monitoring is reality monitoring-which means distinguishing internally and externally generated memories. This experiment examined reality monitoring by children with autism (with a mean mental age of 7 years 8 months). The children said several words and listened to another person say similar words. The children were then given a surprise memory test and asked to identify which words they had said and which the other person had said. The children with autism were compared to matched groups of normal children and children with mental retardation. There were no differences between the groups and, at least for this task, there was no evidence that children with autism have a deficit in their reality monitoring abilities.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1998 · doi:10.1023/a:1026010919219