Assessment & Research

Pills or skills for hyperactive children.

O'Leary (1980) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1980
★ The Verdict

Behavior therapy, not stimulant pills, lifts short-term school marks for kids with ADHD.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing plans for elementary students with ADHD in general-ed classrooms.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only run adult day programs or autism-only caseloads.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Byrd (1980) looked at every paper that compared pills and behavior training for hyperactive kids. The author read studies on stimulant drugs and on classroom behavior plans. No new kids were tested; it is a story-style review.

The review asked two questions. Do meds and skills help kids get along with others? Do they help kids learn math and reading?

02

What they found

Both pills and behavior plans helped kids sit still and play nicely for a few weeks. Only behavior plans also raised reading and math scores in the same short window.

No study back then ran long enough to tell if either help lasts.

03

How this fits with other research

Whalen et al. (1979) adds a twist. They saw hyperactive boys act the same whether on placebo or medicine if the room was quiet and work was self-paced. Byrd (1980) agrees pills can calm kids, but shows the calm does not turn into better schoolwork.

YAller et al. (2023) ran a long trial with parent training, behavior charts, and play therapy. Their drug-free package beat meds on family stress and self-esteem, yet failed on core ADHD symptom scales. This extends D’s call for longer behavioral studies and shows even big packages may not touch every target.

Ingham et al. (1992) gave kids checklists to rate their own behavior. The small case study found self-management plus teacher praise kept gains alive after meds stopped. It is a later example of the skill-based tools D said we need.

04

Why it matters

If you write a treatment plan, start with behavior tools that teach academic skills. Pills may smooth behavior, but they do not teach long division. Track both social and academic data; one can move while the other stays flat. Finally, set a plan to fade or adjust any med trial, since we still lack long-term head-to-head data.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a 5-minute timed math sprint with immediate praise and tokens; chart correct digits before and after lunch to see academic change.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
adhd
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The controversial nature of drug treatment of hyperactivity, the incidence and sequelae of hyperactivity, and problems of differential diagnosis of hyperactivity versus aggression were discussed. The effects of psychostimulant medication and behavior therapy on hyperactive children were reviewed with regard to effects on their social and academic behavior. Both treatments have resulted in clear short-term changes in social behavior but neither long-term academic nor long-term social effects have been shown with either treatment. Short-term effects on academic behavior have resulted from behavioral interventions but not from psychostimulants. However, the interventions have been too brief to allow one to draw unequivocal conclusions about the clinical efficacy of behavioral treatments. Although there have been long-term evaluations of psychostimulant therapy, there have not been any evaluations of long-term behavioral treatment programs for hyperactive children. Given the salutary short-term effects of behavior therapy with hyperactive children, extended clinical trials of behavior therapy need to be conducted. Finally, specific directions are suggested for future research.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1980 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-191