Perceived social support in adolescents with and without visual impairment.
Teens with visual impairment feel less parent support but more teacher support—boost both to lift happiness.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Pinquart et al. (2013) asked teens at a residential school to fill out a short survey.
One group had visual impairment. A same-age sighted group served as the comparison.
Kids rated how much support they felt from parents, teachers, and friends.
What they found
Students with visual impairment scored lower on parental support.
The same students scored higher on teacher support.
More support of any kind linked to higher life satisfaction for both groups.
How this fits with other research
Heald et al. (2020) tracked the same cohort into adulthood. They found that early peer support, not parent support, predicted later loneliness.
The two papers seem to clash—Martin says parent support matters now, M et al. say peer support matters later. The difference is timing: Martin captured a teen snapshot, M et al. modeled change across twenty years.
Sticinski et al. (2022) and Heald et al. (2020) used the same survey style with other disability groups. All studies agree: disability can lower perceived support, so measuring it is step one.
Why it matters
If you work with teens who are blind or have low vision, do not assume parents are the main support anchor. Add teacher-mediated peer clubs or structured video calls with classmates. One easy move: schedule a weekly fifteen-minute parent check-in and a daily peer lunch bunch. Both small steps raise support scores and, in turn, life satisfaction.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add a peer lunch bunch and a weekly parent video slot to the schedule.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The study assessed perceived availability of support from parents, peers, and teachers in adolescents with and without visual impairment. Adolescents with visual impairment perceived lower levels of parental support but higher levels of support from teachers than sighted adolescents, and these differences remained stable across a 2-year interval. There was considerable heterogeneity within the groups as adolescents with visual impairment were most often found in clusters with high levels as well as low levels of all assessed sources of support. High perceived support from all sources showed positive associations with life-satisfaction of adolescents with and without visual impairment. As lower levels of perceived parental support of students with visual impairment were based on students from residential schools, we conclude that measures would be welcomed for improvement of parent-child contacts during the school days.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.004